Temporally changing male reproductive success and resource allocation strategy in protandrous Heracleum lanatum (Apiaceae)

Journal of Plant Research

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 227-234

  Konuma, Akihiro ^a   Yahara, Tetsukazu ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Andromonoecy; Flowering phenology; Male fitness; Protandry; Sequential blooming; Sex allocation

Indexed keywords

APIACEAE; APIALES; HERACLEUM; HERACLEUM LANATUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 0031285935     PISSN: 09189440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf02509311     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bawa, K.S. 1983. Patterns of flowering in tropical plants. In C.E. Jones and R.J. Little, eds., Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York, pp. 394-410.
2. Bawa, K.S. and Beach, J.H. 1981. Evolution of sexual system in flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 68: 254-274.
3. Broyles, S.B. and Wyatt, R. 1990. Paternity analysis in natural population of Asclepias exaltata: Multiple paternity, functional gender, and the "pollen donation hypothesis." Evolution 44: 1454-1468.
4. Broyles, S.B. and Wyatt, R. 1995. A reexamination of pollen-donation hypothesis in an experimental population of Asclepias exaltata. Evolution 49: 89-99.
5. Brunet, J. and Charlesworth, D. 1995. Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49: 70-79.
6. Bullock, S.H. and Bawa, K.S. 1981. Sexual dimorphism and annual flowering pattern in Jacaratia dolichaula (D. Smith) Woodson (Caricaceae) in a Costa Rican rain forest. Ecology 62: 1494-1504.
7. Cruden, R.W. and Hermann-Parker, SM. 1977. Temporal dioecism: An alternative to dioecism ? Evolution 31: 863-866.
8. Emms, S.K. 1993. Andromonoecy in Zigadenus paniculatus (Liliaceae): Spacial and temporal patterns of sex allocation. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 914-923.
9. Ennos, R.A. and Dodson, R.K. 1987. Pollen success, functional gender, and assortative mating in an experimental plant population. Heredity 58: 119-126.
10. Fagerström, T. and Wiklund, C. 1982. Why do males emerge before females: protandory as mating strategy in male and female butterflies. Oecologia 52: 164-166.
11. Hendrix, S.D. 1986. Reaction of Heracleum lanatum to floral herbivory by Depressaria pastinacella. Ecology 65: 191-197.
12. Lee, T.D. 1988. Patterns of fruit and seed production. In J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust, eds., Plant Reproductive Ecology, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, pp. 179-202.
13. Meagher, T.R. 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely male parents. Amer. Nat. 128: 199-215.
14. Meagher, T.R. 1991. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success. Amer. Nat. 137: 738-752.
15. Schoen, D.J. and Stewart, S.C. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40: 1109-1121.
16. Snow, A.A. and Lewis, P.O. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: Empirical approaches. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 331-351.
17. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.
18. Thompson, J.N. and Price, P.W. 1977. Plant plasticity, phenology, and herbivore dispersion: Wild parsnip and the parsnip webworm. Ecology 58: 1112-1119.
19. Wiklund, C. and Fagerström, T. 1977. Why do males emerge before females: A hypothesis to explain the incidence in protandory in butterflies. Oecologia 31: 153-158.
20. Wiklund, C., Nylin, S. and Forsberg, J. 1991. Sex-related variation in growth rate as a result of selection for large size and protandory in a bivoltine butterfly, Pieris napi. Oikos 36: 56-62.