The role of trainee knowledge structures in aviation team environments

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 235-250

  Stout, Renée J ^a,c   Salas, Eduardo ^a   Kraiger, Kurt ^b  

^a Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Naval Air Warfare Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; ASSERTIVENESS; ATTITUDE; AVIATION; BIOENGINEERING; COGNITION; EDUCATION; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOLDIER; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

AEROSPACE MEDICINE; ASSERTIVENESS; ATTITUDE; AVIATION; COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MILITARY PERSONNEL; QUESTIONNAIRES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0031283490     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0703_4     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Baggett, P. (1991). Animated demonstrations versus written instructions for learning procedural tasks: A preliminary investigation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 687-701.
2. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 241-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333-380). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81.
5. Cooper, G. E., White, M. D., & Lauber, J. K. (Eds.). (1980). Resource management on the flight deck: Proceedings of a NASA/Industry workshop (NASA CP-2120). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center.
6. Dynamics Research Corporation. (1990). Development of measures of crew coordination (Tech. Rep. DAHC35-89-D-0030, Del. Order 0001). Fort Rucker, AL: Army Research Institute.
7. Ford, J. K., & Kraiger, K. (1995). The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1-48). New York: Wiley.
8. Fowlkes, J. E., Lane, N. E., Salas, E., Oser, R. L., & Prince, C. (1994). Improving the measurement of team performance. The TARGETs methodology. Military Psychology, 6, 47-61.
9. Goldsmith, T. E., & Davenport, D. M. (1990). Assessing structural similarity of graphs. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 75-87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10. Goldsmith, T. E., & Johnson, P. (1990). A structural assessment of classroom learning. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 241-254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P., & Acton, W. (1991). Assessing structural knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 88-96.
12. Goldsmith, T. E., & Kraiger, K. (1997). Applications of structural knowledge assessment to training evaluation. In J. K. Ford (Series ed.) & S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout (Asst. Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in organizations (pp. 73-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Gregorich, S. E., Helmreich, R. L., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1990). The structure of cockpit management attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 682-690.
14. Helmreich, R. L. (1984). Cockpit management attitudes. Human Factors, 26, 583-589.
15. Helmreich, R. L., Chidester, T. R., Foushee, H. C., Gregorich, S. & Wilhelm, J. A. (1989). How effective is cockpit resource management training? Issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination (Tech. Rep. 89-2). Austin: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Texas.
16. Helmreich, R. L., & Foushee, H. C. (1993). Why crew resource management? Empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 3-45). San Diego, CA: Academic.
17. Helmreich, R. L., Wilhelm, J. A., & Gregorich, S. (1988). Revised versions of the cockpit management attitudes questionnaire (CMAQ) and CRM seminar evaluation form. (NASA/UT Tech. Rep. 88-3). Austin: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Texas.
18. Holmes, B. E., Braun, C. C., Bowers, C. A., & Salas, E. (1993, October). Mental models: A longitudinal study. Poster session presented at the 37th annual meeting of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, Seattle, WA.
19. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Mental models. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 469-499). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
21. Kraiger, K., & Salas, E. (1993, May). Measuring mental models to assess learning during training. Paper presented at the 8th annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
22. Lauber, J. K. (1987). Cockpit resource management: Background studies and rationale. In H. W. Orlady & H. C. Foushee (Eds.), Cockpit resource management training: Proceedings of the NASA/MAC workshop (NASA CP-2455, pp. 5-14). Moffett Field, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center.
23. Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1993). Training and research for teamwork in the military aircrew. In E. L. Weiner, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 337-366). San Diego, CA: Academic.
24. Ralphs, L. T., & Stephan, E. (1986). HRD in the fortune 500. Training and Development Journal, 40, 69-76.
25. Rouse, W. B., & Morris, N. M. (1986). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 349-362.
26. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M. A. Quiñones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 249-279). Washington, DC: APA Press.
27. Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3-29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Schvaneveldt, R. W. (Ed.). (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Stout, R. J. (1995). Planning effects on communication strategies: A shared mental model perspective. Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 2, 1278-1282.
30. Wiener, E. L., Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (1993). Cockpit resource management. San Diego, CA: Academic.