The cream of other men's wit: Plagiarism and misappropriation in cyberspace

Computer Fraud and Security

Volumn 1997, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 13-19

  Osen, Janet ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031280953     PISSN: 13613723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1361-3723(97)81316-4     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. 1 Byron v Johnston, 35 Eng. Rep. 851 (1816).
2. 2 Mark A. Lemley quoting W. Page Keton, Prosser and Amo; Keeton on Torts 863 (5th ed. 1984).
3. 3 Mark A. Lemley, Rights of Attribution and Integrity in Online Communications, 1995 Journal Online L., art. 2, par. 36.
4. 4 Ian Fisher, What Vonnegut Never Said; It's All the Talk of the Internet's Gossip Underground, New York Times, 6 August 1997, Section B, at 1, col 2.
5. 5 Id.
6. 6 Ian Fisher, Mischief on the Net, New York Times, 3-9 August 1997, Section 4, at 2.
7. 7 A. Engler Anderson, NY Jewish Paper Prints Hoax About Diana's Death, The Jewish Standard, 19 September 1997, at 3.
8. 8 Black's Law Dictionary 1150 (6th ed. 1990).
9. 9 K.R. St. Onge, The Melancholy Anatomy of Plagiarism, 39 (1988).
10. 10 Jaime S. Dursht, Judicial Plagiarism: It May Be Fair Use But Is It Ethical?, Cardozo L. Rev., Vol. 18, 1253, 1256 (1996).
11. 11 Id. at 1257.
12. 12 Newman v Burgin, 930 F.2d 955 (1991).
13. 13 Id. at 962.
14. 14 Jaime S. Dursht quoting Jim Swan, Touching Words: Helen Keller, Plagerism, Authorship, in the Construction of Authorship, Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature, 57 (1994).
15. 15 Id.
16. 16 US Constitution., art. I, 8, cl. 8.
17. 17 Dursht, supra note 10, at 1270.
18. 18 Id.
19. 19 Feist Publications Inc. v Rural Te. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).
20. 20 Id. at 345.
21. 21 Dursht, supra note 10, at 1273.
22. 22 Dursht, supra note 10, at 1274.
23. 23 17 U.S.C. §107.
24. 24 Dursht, supra note 10, at 1276.
25. 25 Dursht, supra note 10, at 1279.
26. 26 Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, July 24, 1971, Paris Text, art. 6bis(1).
27. 27 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 27-28.
28. 28 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 14.
29. 29 Waits v Frito-Lay, 978 F.2d 1093, 1108 (1992).
30. 30 Waldman Publishing v Landoll Inc., 43 F.3d 775 (1994).
31. 31 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 16.
32. 32 Black's Law Dictionary, 901 (5th ed. 1979).
33. 33 Waits v Frito-Lay, 978 F.2d 1093, 1097.
34. 34 Id.
35. 35 Id.
36. 36 Id.
37. 37 Id. at 1097-1098.
38. 38 Id.
39. 39 Id. at 1096-1098.
40. 40 15 U.S.C §1127.
41. 41 Waits v Frito-Lay, 978 F.2d 1093, 1110.
42. 42 Id.
43. 43 Joshua Quittner, Automata Non Grata, Wired, 119 (April 1995).
44. 44 Id.
45. 45 Id.
46. 46 Id. at 121.
47. 47 Id.
48. 48 Id. at 122-123.
49. 49 Id. at 124.
50. 50 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 30.
51. 51 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 35.
52. 52 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 38.
53. 53 Mark A. Lemley quoting Howard Rheingold, The Virtual Community: Homesteading On The Electronic Frontier, 181 (1993).
54. 54 Lemley, supra note 3, at par. 45.