Methodological issues in linking costs and health outcomes in research on differing care delivery systems

Medical Care

Volumn 35, Issue 11 SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages

  Hogan, Andrew J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost; Linkage; Methodology; Outcomes

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY CARE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; NURSING HOME; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

AMBULATORY CARE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NURSING HOMES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);

EID: 0031280171     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199711001-00011     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Donabedian A, Wheeler JR, Wyszewianski L. Quality, cost and health: An integrative model. Med Care 1982;20:975.
2. O'Brien B. Economic evaluation: Frankenstein's monster or vampire of trials. Presented at CePOR'95: Standards for Economic Evaluation of Drugs; April 3, 1995; Chapel Hill, NC.
3. Gardiner KG, Tilbury M. A longitudinal cost analysis of primary and team nursing. Nurs Econ 1991;9:97.
4. Mitchell PH, Armstrong S, Simpson TF, et al. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Demonstration Project: Profile of excellence in critical nursing. Heart Lung 1989;18:219.
5. Shukla RK. All-RN model of nursing care delivery: A cost-benefit evaluation. Inquiry 1983;20:173.
6. Prescott PA. Nursing: An important component of hospital survival under a reformed health care system. Nurs Econ 1993;11:192.
7. Gravelly EH, Littlefield JH. A cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 staffing models for the delivery of low-risk prenatal care. Am J Public Health 1992;82:180.
8. Nyman JA. Improving the quality of nursing home outcomes: Are adequacy or incentive oriented policies more effective. Med Care 1988;26:1158.
9. Cohen JW, Spector WD. The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes. J Health Econ 1996;15:23.
10. Munroe DJ. The influence of registered nursing staff on the quality of nursing home care. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:263.
11. Spector WD, Takada HA. Characteristics of nursing homes that affect resident outcomes. J Aging Health 1991;3:427.
12. Braun BI. The effect of nursing home quality on patient outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:329.
13. Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK, eds. Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
14. Verran JA. Quality of care, organization variables and nurse staffing. In: Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK, eds. Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996:308.
15. Maas M, Buckwalter K, Specht J. Nursing staff and quality of care in nursing homes. In: Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK, eds. Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996:361.
16. Johnson J, McKeen Cowles C, Simmens SJ. Quality of care and nursing staff in nursing homes. In: Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK, eds. Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996:426.
17. Harrington CA. Nursing facility quality, staffing and economic issues. In: Wunderlich GS, Sloan FA, Davis CK, eds. Nursing staff in hospitals and nursing homes: Is it adequate? Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996:453.
18. Rice T, Gabel J. The internal economics of HMOs: A research agenda. Med Care Res Rev 1996;53(suppl):S44.
19. Kennedy P. A guide to econometrics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.