A simple device for the stereoscopic display of 3D CT images

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1053-1056

  Haveri, M ^a   Suramo, Ilkka ^a   Junila, J ^a   Lahde S ^a   Karhula, V ^a  

^a OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

CT; Image processing; Stereoscopic vision

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FRACTURE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; PELVIC GIRDLE; RADIOGRAPHY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ACETABULUM; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; PELVIC BONES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0031279365     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/02841859709172130     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BURK D. L. JR, MEARS D. C., KENNEDY W. H. et al.: Three-dimensional computed tomography of acetabular fractures. Radiology 155 (1985), 183.
2. COLIN D., MERIOT P., NONENT M. et al.: 3-dimensional reconstruction of x-ray computed tomographic views in fractures of the acetabulum. J. Radiol. 72 (1991), 157.
3. COUTANT B. E. & WESTHEIMER G.: Population distribution of stereoscopic ability. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 13 (1993), 3.
4. FISMAN E. K., DREBIN B., MAGID D. et al.: Volumetric rendering techniques. Applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology 163 (1987), 737.
5. FISHMAN E. K., MAGID D., NEY D. R. et al.: Three-dimensional imaging. [Published erratum appears in Radiology 182 (1992), 899.] Radiology 181 (1991), 321.
6. GAUTSCH T. L., JOHNSON E. E. & SEEGER L. L.: True three dimensional stereographic display of 3D reconstructed CT scans of the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin. Orthop. 305 (1994), 138.
7. HEMMY D. C., ZONNEVELD F. W., LOBREGT S. et al.: A decade of clinical three-dimensional imaging. A review. Part I. Historical development. Invest. Radiol. 29 (1994), 489.
8. MAGID D. & FISHMAN E. K.: Imaging of musculoskeletal trauma in three dimensions. An integrated two-dimensional/three-dimensional approach with computed tomography. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 27 (1989), 945.
9. MAGID D., FISHMAN E. K., BROOKER A. F. JR et al.: Multiplanar computed tomography of acetabular fractures. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 10 (1986), 778.
10. MARTINEZ C. R., DI PASQUALE T. G., HELFET D. L. et al.: Evaluation of acetabular fractures with two- and three-dimensional CT. Radiographics 12 (1992), 227.
11. MURPHEY M. D.: Invited commentary to the article by Potok P. S., Hopper K. D. & Umlauf M. J.: Fractures of the acetabulum. Imaging, classification, and understanding. Radiographics 15 (1995), 7. Radiographics 15 ( 1995), 23.
12. MURPHEY M. D.: Invited commentary to the article by Potok P. S., Hopper K. D. & Umlauf M. J.: Fractures of the acetabulum. Imaging, classification, and understanding. Radiographics 15 (1995), 7. Radiographics 15 ( 1995), 23.
13. OWCZARCZYK J. & OWCZARCZYK B.: Evaluation of true 3D display systems for visualizing medical volume data. Vis. Comput. 6 (1990), 219.
14. SCOTT W. W. JR, FISHMAN E. K. & MAGID D.: Acetabular fractures. Optimal imaging. Radiology 165 (1987), 537.