Estimating ischemic burden: Comparison of two formulas

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 463-466

  Caldwell, Mary A ^a   Pelter, Michele ^a   Drew, Barbara J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA;

EID: 0031278248     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc1997.6.6.463     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Holland RP, Arnsdorf MF. Solid angle theory and the electrocardiogram: physiologic and quantitative interpretations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1977;19:431-457.
2. Surawicz B. ST-T abnormalities. In: Macfarlane PW, Lawrie TDV, eds. Comprehensive Electrocardiology: Theory and Practice in Health and Disease. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1989:512-563.
3. Christian TF, Gibbons RJ, Clements IP, et al. Estimates of myocardium at risk and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiographic indexes with comparison to radionuclide and angiographic measures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:388-393.
4. Cohen M, Scharpf SJ, Rentrop KP. Prospective analysis of electrocardiographic variables as markers for extent and location of acute wall motion abnormalities observed during coronary angioplasty in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:17-24.
5. Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J, et al. Use of initial ST-segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:749-753.
6. Clemmensen P, Grande P, Saunamaki K, et al. Effect of intravenous streptokinase on the relation between initial ST-predicted size and final QRS-estimated size of acute myocardial infarcts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;16:1252-1257.
7. Weyne AE, DeBuyzere ML, Bauwens FR, Clement DL. Assessment of myocardial ischemia by 12-lead electrocardiography and Frank vector system during coronary angioplasty: value of a new orthogonal lead system for quantitative ST segment monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1704-1710.
8. Mirvis DM, Berson AS, Goldberger AL, et al. Instrumentation and practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in special care units: a report for health professionals by a Task Force of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association [published erratum appears in Circulation. 1989;80(2):A85]. Circulation. 1989;79:464-471.
9. Drew BJ, Koops RR, Adams MG, Dower GE. Derived 12-lead ECG: comparison with the standard ECG during myocardial ischemia and its potential application for continuous ST-segment monitoring. J Electrocardiol. 1994;27(suppl):249-255.
10. Pelter MM, Adams MG, Drew BJ. Computer versus manual measurement of ST-segment deviation. J Electrocardiol. 1997;29(suppl):78-82.
11. Schroder R, Dissmann R, Bruggemann T, et al. Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:384-391.
12. Tomai F, Crea F, Gaspardone A, et al. Mechanisms of cardiac pain during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1892-1896.
13. Wong CK, Freedman SB. Usefulness of continuous ST monitoring in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction for describing the relation between precordial ST depression and inferior ST elevation. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:532-537.
14. Peterson ED, Hathaway WR, Zabel KM, et al. Prognostic significance of precordial ST segment depression during inferior myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: results in 16,521 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:305-312.