On the application of subspace methods for small sample size

AEU-Archiv fur Elektronik und Ubertragungstechnik

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 279-289

  Nickel, Ulrich R O ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^e VDE/ITG ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive beamforming; Array channel errors; Dimension estimation; Subspace estimation; Superresolution; Weighted projections

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; ERRORS; ESTIMATION; INTERFERENCE SUPPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; VECTORS;

ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING; CHANNEL ERRORS; MATRIX TRANSFORMATION BASED PROJECTIONS; SIGNAL POWER LEAKAGE; SUBSPACE METHODS;

SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0031275945     PISSN: 00011096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schmidt, R.: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. AP-34 (1986), 276-280.
2. Bienvenue, G.; Kopp, L.: Optimality of high resolution array processing using the eigensystem approach. IEEE Trans. Assp-31 (1983), 1235-1248.
3. Thorpe, J.; Scharf, L. L.: Data adaptive rank shaping methods for solving least squares problems. IEEE Trans. SP-43 (1995), 591-1601.
4. Nickel, U.: Subarray configurations for digital beamforming with low sidelobes and adaptive interference suppression. Proc. IEEE Int. Radar Conf., IEEE Cat. No. 95CH-3571-0, 1995. 714-719.
5. Stoica, P.; Nehorai, A.: MUSIC, Maximum Likelihood and Cramér-Rao bound, Further results and comparison. IEEE Trans. ASSP-38 (1990), 2140-2150.
6. Zhang, Q. T.: Probability of resolution of the MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Trans. SP-43 (1995), 978-987.
7. Gierull, C.: Statistical analysis of the eigenvector projection method for adaptive spatial filtering of interferences. IEE Proc. Radar, Sonar & Navig. 144 (1997), 57-63.
8. Gierull, C.: A fast subspace estimation method for adaptive beamforming based on covariance matrix transformation. AEÜ Int. J. Electr. Commun. 51 (1997), 196-205.
9. Hung, E. K. L.; Turner, R. M.: A fast beamforming algorithm for large arrays. IEEE Trans. AES- 19 (1983), 589-607.
10. Nickel, U.: Some properties of fast projections methods of the Hung-Turner type. - In: Signal Processing III: Theories and Applications (Conf. Rec. EUSIPCO-86). Young, I. T.; Biemond, J.; Duin, R.; Gerbrands, J. J. (eds.). North Holland, 1986, 1165-1168.
11. Gierull, C. H.: Performance analysis of fast projections of the Hung-Turner type for adaptive beamforming. Signal Processing 50 (1996), 17-28.
12. Toulgoat, M.; Gierull, C.; Turner, R.: Subspace estimation without eigenvectors for adaptive beamforming. DREO-Report 1194, Ottawa, Canada: Defence Research Establishment Ottawa, 1993.
13. Yeh, C. C.: Projection approach to bearing estimation. IEEE Trans. ASSP-34 (1986), 1347-1349.
14. Brandwood, D. H.: Noise-space projection: MUSIC without eigenvectors. IEE Proc. Pt. H. 134 (1987), 303-309.
15. Gierull, C.: Schnelle Signalraumschätzung in Radaranwendungen, (PhD thesis Ruhr-University Bochum, Faculty of El. Eng.). Aachen, Germany: Shaker-Verlag, 1995.
16. Nickel, U.: On the influence of channel errors on array signal processing methods. AEÜ Int. J. Electr. Commun. 47 (1993), 209-219.
17. Muirhead, R. J.: Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. John Wiley & Sons, 1982.
18. Zhang, Q. T.; Wong, K. M.: Information theoretic criteria for the determination of the number of signals in spatially correlated noise. IEEE Trans. SP-41 (1993), 1652-1663.
19. Nickel, U.: Vergleich einiger Superauflöseverfahren zur Spektrallinienschätzung. FFM-Report 317, Wachtberg, Germany: FGAN-FFM, 1982.
20. Haykin, S.; Litva, J.; Shepherd, T. J.: Radar array processing. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
21. Shah, A. A.; Tufts, D. W.: Determination of a signal subspace from short data records. IEEE Trans. SP-42 (1994), 2531-2535.
22. Nickel, U.: Comparison of some criteria to determine the dimension of the signal subspace for small sample size. FFM-Report 457, Wachtberg, Germany: FGAN-FFM, 1996.