Earthquake damage and loss estimation methodology and data for salt lake county, Utah (ATC-36)

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 623-642

  Rojahn, Christopher ^a   King, Stephanie A ^b   Scholl, Roger E ^c   Kiremidjian, Anne S ^b   Reaveley, Lawrence D ^d   Wilson, Robert R ^e  

^a Applied Technology Council   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c University of Utah ^*  (United States)

^d Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^e Federal Emergency Management Agency   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; ESTIMATION METHOD; GIS; GROUND MOTION; MORTALITY;

SALT LAKE COUNTY; UNITED STATES; UTAH;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPREADSHEETS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE ESTIMATION; EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

EID: 0031273039     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1585972     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ATC, in progress, Earthquake Loss Evaluation Methodology and Database for Utah, ATC-36 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
2. ATC, 1985, Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, ATC-13 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
3. ATC, 1987, Evaluating the Seismic Resistance of Existing Buildings, ATC-14 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
4. ATC, 1988, Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards: A Handbook, ATC-21 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
5. ATC, 1989, Handbook for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, ATC-22 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
6. ATC, 1991, Seismic Vulnerability and Impact of Disruption of Lifelines in the Coterminous United States, ATC-25 Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
7. Anagnos, T., Rojahn, C., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1995, NCEER-ATC Joint Study on Fragility of Buildings, Technical Report NCEER-95-0003, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
8. Boore, D.M., Joyner, W.B., and Fumai, T.E., 1993, Estimation of Response Spectra and Peak Accelerations from Western North American Earthquakes: An Interim Report, Open File Report 93-509, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
9. Emmi, P. C., and Horton, C. A., 1993, "A GIS-Based Assessment of Earthquake Property Damage and Casualty Risk," Earthquake Spectra, V. 9 , No. 1, pp. 11-33.
10. King, S. A. and Kiremidjian, A.S., 1994, Regional Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis Through Geographic Information Systems, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Tech. Report No. 111, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
11. Rentzis, D. N., Kiremidjian, A. S., and Howard, H. C., 1992, Identification of High Risk Areas Through Integrated Building Inventories, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Tech. Report No. 98, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
12. Taylor, C.E. (ed), 1991, Seismic Loss Estimated for a Hypothetical Water System, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Monograph No. 2, American Society of Civil Engineers.
13. Trifunac, M.D. and Brady, A.G., 1975, "On the Correlation of Seismic Intensity with Peaks of Recorded Strong Ground Motion," Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Volume 65, Number 1, pp. 139-162.
14. URS/Blume, 1989, Metropolitan Boston Area Earthquake Loss Study, Report to the Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency, San Francisco, Calif.
15. Vasudevan, R., Kiremidjian, A. S., and Howard, H. C., An Integrated Inventory Methodology for Seismic Damage Assessment, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Technical Report No. 102, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.