A review of key research design and statistical analysis issues

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 84, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 550-556

  Baumgardner, Kirk R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PROBABILITY; RANDOMIZATION; REVIEW; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; GOALS; HUMANS; PROBABILITY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS;

EID: 0031264793     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90272-9     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Lionel NDW, Hexheimer A. Assessing reports of therapeutic trials. Br Med J 1970;3:637-40.
2. Schor S, Karten I. Statistical evaluation of medical journal manuscripts. JAMA 1966;195:1123-8.
3. Badgley RF. An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals. Can Med Assoc J 1961;85:246-9.
4. Dow PR, Ingle JX. Isotope determination of root failures. Oral Surg 1955;8:1100-4.
5. Swanson K, Madison S. An evaluation of coronal microleakage in endodontically treated teeth, part I: time periods. J Endodon 1987;13:56-9.
6. Ingle JI. The Washington Study. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, eds. Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994. p. 25-44.
7. Pitt Ford TR. Relation between seal of root fillings and tissue response. Oral Surg 1983;55:291-4.
8. Zander H. Reaction of dental pulps to silicate cement with cavity varnishes and cement liners. J Am Dent Assoc 1947;34:811-7.
9. Mitchell DF, Buonocore MG, Schazer S. Pulp reactions to silicate cement and other materials: relation to cavity depth. Dent Res 1962;41:591-7.
10. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholtz G. Biocorapatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
11. Radford EP. Human health effects of low doses of ionizing radiation: the BEIR III controversy. Radiat Res 1980;84:369-94.
12. Cohen BL. Alternatives to the BEIR relative risk model for explaining atomic-bomb survivor cancer mortality. Health Phys 1987;52:55-63.
13. Maillie HD, Jacobson AP. A graphical method of estimating fatal radiation-induced cancers using the BEIR V method. Health Phys 1992;63:273-80.
14. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using rank sums, Technometrics 1964;6:241-52.