|
Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 9-16
|
Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUVENILE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
MENTAL DISEASE;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
MENTAL PATIENT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
T.D. V. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES;
T.D. V. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTAL DISORDERS;
MENTALLY ILL PERSONS;
MINORS;
NEW YORK;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
THERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0031263086
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3527712 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (22)
|
References (26)
|