Affirmative action policies are demeaning to women in academia

Canadian Psychology

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 238-243

  Kimura, Doreen ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031260740     PISSN: 07085591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0708-5591.38.4.238     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Benbow C.P. & Lubinski D. (1993). Consequences of gender differences in mathematical reasoning ability and some biological linkages. In M. Haug, R.E. Whalen, C. Aron & K. Olsen (Eds.), The development of sex differences and similarities in behavior. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 87-109.
2. Benditt J., Ed., (1994). Women in science '94. Comparisons across cultures. Science, 263, 1391-1496.
3. Biennial PhD survey of the National Science Foundation. (1991). Science, 252, 1112-1117.
4. Brown G. (1993). Discrimination in hiring: The statistical evidence. In M. Walker (Ed.), In defence of academic freedom and scholarship. Fraser Forum, Critical Issues Bulletin III. Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, p. 40-48.
5. Brush S.G. (1991). Women in science and engineering. American Scientist, 79, 404-419.
6. Campbell J.R. (1991). The roots of gender inequity in technical areas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 251-164.
7. Chipman S.F. (1988). Sex differences in parallax view. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 11, 188.
8. Cole J.R. (1987). Women in science. In D.N. Jackson & J.P. Rushton (Eds), Scientific excellence. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, pp. 359-375.
9. Dawson R. (1993). Math: cornerstone of engineering. CAUT Bulletin (Letters), February.
10. Dobson K.S. (1993). Letter to author, 25 September.
11. Fausto-Sterling A. (1992). Myths of gender. New York: Basic Books.
12. Favreau O.E. (1993). Letter to CBC Ombudsman, 8 July.
13. Gouchie C. & Kimura D. (1991). The relationship between testosterone levels and cognitive ability patterns. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16, 323-334.
14. Hacker S.L. (1983). Mathematization of engineering: Limits on women and the field. In J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina ex dea. Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon. pp. 38-58.
15. Horowitz I.L. (1993). The decomposition of sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Irvine A.D. (1996). Jack and Jill and employment equity. Dialogue, 35, 255-291.
17. Keller E.F. (1983). Women, science, and popular mythology. In J. Rothschild (Ed.), Machina ex dea. Feminist perspectives on technology. New York: Pergamon, pp. 130-146.
18. Lee J. (1993). Women in academia- a growing minority. Perspectives, Spring 1993, Statistics Canada, 24-30.
19. Linn M.C. & Hyde J.S. (1989). Gender, mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 18, 17-19, 22-27.
20. Long J.S. (1993). Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71, 159-178.
21. Lubinski D. & Benbow C.P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66.
22. Mather J. (1996). Why are there few women scientists? CAUT Bulletin, Status of Women Supplement, 43, pages 3 and 9.
23. Pettifor J.L. (1993). Column in Psynopsis, Summer, page 12. Report of the 5th Canadian conference of women in engineering, science and technology. (1992). Glendon College, York University, August.
24. Steen L.A. (1987). Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness. Science, 237, 251-252, 302.
25. Wainer H. & Steinberg L.S. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the Mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323-335.