Communication without constellation? Habermas's argumentative turn in (and away from) critical theory

Communication Theory

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 301-320

  Fusfield, William ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031260717     PISSN: 10503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00155.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adorno, T. (1979a). Negative dialectics (E. B. Ashton, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
2. Adorno,T. (1979b). Reconciliation under duress. In F. Jameson (EA.), Politics and aesthetics (pp. 157-176). London: New Left Books.
3. Adorno, T. (1981). Noten zur literatur. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
4. Albert, H. (1975). Transcendentale Träumereien: Karl-Otto Apels Sphrachspiele und sein hermeneutischer Gott. Hamburg, Germany: Hoffman und Campe.
5. Albert, H. (1980). Traktat über kritische Vernunft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
6. Anderson, W. (1985). "Perpetual affirmations, unexplained": The rhetoric of reiteration in Coleridge, Carlyle, and Emerson. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 37-51.
7. Benjamin, W. (1985). Epistemo-critical prologue. Origin of German tragic drama (J. Osborne, Trans.). London: Verso.
8. Bercovitch, S. (1993). The rites of assent: Transformations in the symbolic construction of America. New York: Routledge.
9. Buell, L. (1973). Style and vision in the American renaissance. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
10. Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmoderism. New York: St. Martin's Press.
11. Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology (G. Chakravorty Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Fusfield, W. (1986). The rules of argumentation aren't valid for me . . . either! An additional refutation of Wolfgang Kuhlmann's alleged "transcendental final-grounding" of ethics and philosophy. In F. H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international conference on argumentation (pp. 336-346). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
13. Fusfield, W. (1989). Can Jürgen Habermas's "Begründungsprogramm" escape Hans Albert's "Munchhausen Trilemma." In J. Dyck, W. Jens, & G. Ueding (Eds.), Rhetorik: Ein internationales Jahrbuch (pp. 73-82). Tuebingen, West Germany: Niemeyer Verlag.
14. Fusfield, W. (1991). "Nothing should and nothing can be proved": Young Friedrich Schlegel's declarative challenge to the demonstrative voice of western rhetoric. In F. H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international conference on argumentation (pp. 45-53). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: ISSA Publishers.
15. Fusfield, W. (1992). Some pseudoscientific features of transcendental-pragmatic grounding projects. In H. Albert, W. Becker, & K. Salamun (Eds.), Mensch und Gesellschaft aus der Sicht des kritischen Rationalismus (pp. 336-346). Amsterdam: Rodopi Editions Press.
16. Fusfield, W. (1995). Blaming Lysias: On the origins of western argumentative justification in the Socratic proscription/utilization of stylistic, reiterative, equivocative and combinatorial rhetorical forms. In F. H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on argumentation (pp. 311-327). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: ISSA Publishers.
17. Fusfield, W. (1996). "Combinatorial writing" to "constellation" epistemology: Friedrich Schlegel's influence on Walter Benjamin and the Frankfurt School. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association National Convention, San Diego, CA.
18. Fusfield, W. (1997). "To prove it . . . is . . . really superfluous": Friedrich Schlegel's early repudiation of philosophical and scientific "demonstration" in the eighty-second Athenauem Fragment. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 83(2), 133-151.
19. Habermas, J. (1979). What is universal pragmatics? Communication and the evolution of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
20. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
21. Habermas, J. (1983). Diskursethik - Notizen zu einem Begründungsprogramm. Moral Bewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
22. Horkheimer, M. (1972). Traditional and critical theory. Critical theory (M. J. O'Connell, 188-243). New York: Herder and Herder.
23. Jameson, F. (1990). Late-Marxism: Adorno, or, the persistence of the dialectic. London: Verso.
24. Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian moment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Poulakos, J. & Whitson, S. (1993). Nietzsche and the aesthetics of rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech.
26. Schlegel, F. (1964). Kritische Friedrich Schlegel Ausgabe (Vol. 2, 3, & 18). Munich, Germany: Schoeningh Verlag.
27. Stubbes, M. (1983). Can I have that in writing please? Some neglected topics in speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 479-494.
28. Williamson, A. (1995). Images of blood: Ethnic identity and the destruction of the left in Europe and America, 1972-1992. Sacramento: California State University Press.
29. Zinn, H. (1995). A people's history of the United States: 1492 to the present. New York: HarperCollins.