Marine debris, beach quality, and non-market values

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 223-247

  Smith, V Kerry ^a   Zhang, Xiaolong ^b   Palmquist, Raymond B ^c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Marine debris; Scope test

Indexed keywords

BEACHES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ESTIMATION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL; WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION;

CONTINGENT VALUATION (CV) SURVEY; MARINE DEBRIS;

MARINE POLLUTION;

EID: 0031260301     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026465413899     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1958), 'Utilities, Attitudes and Choices: A Review Note', Econometrica 26 (January), 1-23.
2. Arrow, K., R. Solow, E. E. Learner, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1994), 'Comment on NOAA Proposed Rule on Natural Resource Damage Assessments', ANPNM, Comment No. 69, January 7.
3. Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Learner, R. Radner, and H. Schuman (1993), 'Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation', Federal Register, January 15 58(10), 4601-4614.
4. Beggs, S., S. Cardell, and J. A. Hausman (1981), 'Assessing the Potential Demand for Electric Cars', Journal of Econometrics 16 (September), 1-19.
5. Cameron, T. A. (1988), 'A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data'. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (September), 355-379.
6. Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith with M. Conaway and K. Martin (forthcoming), 'Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation', Review of Economics and Statistics (in press).
7. Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, and V. K. Smith (1994), Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight. Report to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, Ca., September.
8. Carson, R. T., R. C. Mitchell, W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P. A. Ruud (1992), A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, Ca., November 10.
9. Cole, C. A., W. P. Gregg, D. V. Richards, and D. A. Manski (1995), Annual Report of National Park Marine Debris Monitoring Program, Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, July.
10. Diamond, Peter A. and Jerry A. Hausman (1994), 'Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better Than No Number', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 45-64.
11. Freeman, A. M. III (1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
12. Hanemann, W. M. (1984), 'Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Responses', American Journal of Agriculture Economics 66 (August), 332-341.
13. Hanemann, W. M. (1994), 'Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 19-44.
14. Heckman, J. (1979), 'Sample Bias as a Specification Error', Econometrica 47 (January), 153-162.
15. Kreps, D. M. (1990), A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
16. McConnell, K. E. (1990), 'Models for Referendum Data: The Structure of Discrete Choice Models for Contingent Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (January), 19-34.
17. McFadden, D. (1974), 'Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior', in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105-142.
18. Poirier, D. (1980), 'Partial Observability in Bivariate Probit Models', Journal of Econometrics 12, 209-217.
19. Portney, P. R. (1994), 'The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (Fall), 3-18.
20. Smith, V. K. (1993), 'NonMarket Valuation of Environmental Resources: An Interpretive Appraisal', Land Economics 69 (February), 1-26.
21. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran (1980), Statistical Methods, 7th edition. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
22. Zhang, X. (1995) Integrating Resource Types, Payment Methods, and Access Conditions to Model Use and Nonuse Values: Valuing Marine Debris Control. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
23. Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1992a), Marine Debris Focus Group I: Summary Report I. Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University. Unpublished paper, January 27.
24. Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1992b), Marine Debris Focus Group II: Summary Report. Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University. Unpublished paper, January 27.
25. Zhang, X., V. K. Smith, and R. B. Palmquist (1993), Marine Debris Focus Group III: Summary Report. Resource and Environmental Economics Program, North Carolina State University. Unpublished paper, June 17.