Applying stochastic simulation techniques to a deterministic vadose zone solute transport model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 197, Issue 1-4, 1997, Pages 88-110

  Wu, Q J ^a   Ward, A D ^b   Workman, S R ^c   Salchow, E M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE PACKAGE GLEAMS; VADOSE ZONE SOLUTE TRANSPORT MODEL;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FLOW OF WATER; HYDROLOGY; MASS TRANSFER; NITRATES; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RANDOM PROCESSES; SOIL TESTING; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

SURFACE WATERS;

NITRATES; SIMULATION; SOLUTE TRANSPORT;

GLEAMS MODEL; NITRATE; SOIL WATER; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; STOCHASTIC MODEL; VADOSE ZONE; WATER FLOW;

USA, OHIO;

EID: 0031259691     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03272-6     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bratley, P., Fox, B.L. and Schrage, L.E., 1983. A Guide to Simulation. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Bresler, E., 1989. Estimation of statistical moments of spatial field averages for soil properties and crop yields. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53: 1645-1653.
3. Burden, D.S. and Selim, H.M., 1989. Correlation of spatially variable soil water retention for a surface soil. Soil Sci., 148: 436-447.
4. Chong, S.-K. and Teng, T.-M., 1986. Relationship between the runoff curve number and hydrologic soil properties. J. Hydrol., 84: 1-7.
5. Dagan, G. and Bresler, E., 1979. Solute dispersion in unsaturated heterogeneous soil at field scale: I. theory. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 43: 461-467.
6. ESRI Institute, Inc., 1992. ARC/INFO Command References, Arc Command References. ESRI Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA.
7. Farida, S.G., Dahab, M.F. and Woldt, W.E., 1994. Consideration of spatial variability in nitrate contamination to groundwater. ASAE Paper 94-2092. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
8. Gowda, P.H., Ward, A.D. and White, D.A., 1996. Using GIS with a field scale model to describe agricultural impacts on Rock Creek Watershed. ASAE Paper 96-3090. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
9. Greminger, P.J., Sud, Y.K. and Nielsen, D.R., 1985. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water characteristics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 49: 1075-1082.
10. Hahn, G.J. and Shapiro, S.S., 1967. Statistical Models in Engineering. Wiley, New York.
11. Hills, R.C. and Reynolds, S.G., 1969. Illustrations of soil moisture variability in selected areas and plots of different sizes. J. Hydrol., 8: 27-47.
12. Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W., 1992. Applied Multi-Variate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Jury, W.A., 1982. Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model. Water Resour. Res., 18: 363-368.
14. Jury, W.A., 1995. Stochastic solute transport modeling trends and their potential compatibility with GIS. Applications of GIS to the Modeling of Non-Point Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone, Proceedings of 1995 Bouyoucos Conference, 1-3 May 1995, Riverside, CA, USA, pp. 393-405.
15. Knisel, W.G. (Editor), 1993. GLEAMS Manual, Version 2.10. UGA-CPES-BAED Publication, 5. University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA.
16. Knisel, W.G., Davis, F.M. and Leonard, R.A., 1992. GLEAMS User Manual, Version 2.0. University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA.
17. Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G. and Davis, F.M., 1990. The GLEAMS model - a tool for evaluating agrichemical ground-water loading as affected by chemistry, soils, climate and management. Transferring Models to Users. American Water Resources Association, pp. 187-197.
18. Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G. and Still, D.A., 1987. GLEAMS: groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans. ASAE, 30: 1403-1418.
19. Mantoglou, A., 1992. A theoretical approach for modeling unsaturated flow in spatially variable soils: Effective flow models in finite domains and nonstationarity. Water Resour. Res., 28: 251-267.
20. McKeague, J.A., Wang, C. and Topp, G.C., 1982. Estimating saturated hydraulic conductivity from soil morphology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46: 1239-1244.
21. Philip, J.R., 1980. Field heterogeneity, some basic issues. Water Resour. Res., 16: 443-448.
22. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, the Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, New York.
23. Richards, L.A., 1931. Capillary conductivity of liquid through porous media. Physics, 1: 318-333.
24. Ripley, B.D., 1987. Stochastic Simulation. Wiley, New York.
25. Russo, D., 1991. Stochastic analysis of simulated vadose zone solute transport in a vertical cross section of heterogeneous soil during nonsteady water flow. Water Resour. Res., 27: 267-283.
26. Russo, D. and Bouton, M., 1992. Statistical analysis of spatial variability in unsaturated flow parameters. Water Resour. Res., 28: 1911-1925.
27. Salchow, E.M., 1994. Spatial variability in soil physical and hydrological properties in an alluvial system in southern Ohio. M.S. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
28. SAS Institute Inc., 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th edition, Vol. 1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
29. Sharma, M.L., Gander, G.A. and Hunt, C.G., 1980. Spatial variability of infiltration in a watershed. J. Hydrol., 45: 101-122.
30. Skaggs, R.W., 1978. A water management model for shallow water table soils. Water Resources Research Institute, University of North Carolina, Report No. 134.
31. Sudicky, E.A., 1986. A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process. Water Resour. Res., 22: 2069-2082.
32. Taylor, S.E., Bender, D.A., Triche, M.H. and Woeste, F.E., 1993. Monte-Carlo simulation methods for engineered wood systems. ASAE Paper 93-5501. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI.
33. Ünlü, K., Nielsen, D.R., Biggar, J.W. and Morkoc, F., 1990. Statistical parameters characterizing the spatial variability of selected soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54: 1537-1547.
34. USDA-SCS, 1972. Hydrology, Section 4. SCS National Engineering Handbook. Washington, DC.
35. Ward, A.D., Hatfield, J.L., Lamb, J.A., Alberts, E.E., Logan, T.J. and Anderson, LL., 1994. The management systems evaluation areas program: tillage and water quality research. Soil Tillage Res., 30: 49-74.
36. Wesenbeeck, I.J.V. and Kachanoski, R.G., 1991. Spatial scale dependence of in situ solute transport. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 55: 3-7.
37. White, R.E., 1987. A transfer function model for the prediction of nitrate leaching under field conditions. J. Hydrol., 92: 207-222.
38. Williams, J.R. and Nicks, A.D., 1982. CREAMS hydrology model - option 1. In: V.P. Singh (Editor), Applied Modeling in Catchment Hydrology, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rainfall-Runoff Modeling. Water Research Publication, Littleton, CO, pp. 69-86.
39. Workman, S.R., Ward, A.D. and Knisel, W.G., 1993. Assessing the movement of agricultural chemicals through the soil profile at the Ohio management systems evaluation area. In: Y. Eckstein and A. Zaporozec (Editors), Industrial and Agricultural Impacts on the Hydrologic Environment, Proceedings of the Second USA/CIS Joint Conference on Environmental Hydrology and Hydrogeology. Washington, DC, Water Environmental Federation, Alexandria, VA, pp. 145-158.
40. Wu, Q., 1994. A stochastic-deterministic-conceptual (SDC) methodology for simulation of flow and solute transport through heterogeneous unsaturated soils. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
41. Wu, Q., Ward, A.D. and Workman., S.R., 1996. Using GIS in simulation of nitrate leaching from heterogeneous unsaturated soils. J. Environ. Qual., 25: 526-534.