Validity and reliability of the MTI Photoscreener

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 74, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 859-864

  Hatch, Stanley W ^a,c   Tibbles, Carrie D ^b   Mestito, Irene R ^a   Read, Rachel ^a   Travies, Lisa ^a   Richman, Jack ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Amblyopia; MTI Photoscreener; Photorefraction; Strabismus; Vision screening

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; LIGHT REFRACTION; PEDIATRICS; VISION;

PHOTOSCREENERS; VISION SCREENING;

OPTICAL DEVICES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; CHILD; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RELIABILITY; RETINOSCOPY; SCREENING TEST; STRABISMUS; VISION TEST; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0031257665     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mohindra I, Held R. Refraction in humans from birth to five years. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 28;1981:19-27.
2. Scheiman M, Gallaway M, Coulter R, Reinstein F, Ciner E, Heizberg C, Parisi M. Prevalence of vision and ocular disorders in a clinical pediatric population. J Am Optom Assoc 1996;67:193-202.
3. American Optometric Association. Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline: Pediatric Eye Care. St. Louis: American Optometric Association, 1994.
4. Preslan MW, Novak A. Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Ophthalmology 1996;103:105-9.
5. Ciner EB. Management of refractive errors in infants, toddlers, and preschool children. Prob Optom 1990;2:394-419.
6. Ciuffreda KJ, Levi DM, Selenow A. Amblyopia: Basic and Clinical Aspects. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991:371-5.
7. von Noordon GK. Binocular Vision and Oculomotility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1996:1-55.
8. Pratt-Johnson JA. 18th annual Frank Costenbader lecture. Fusion and suppression: development and loss. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992;29:4-11.
9. Lennerstrand G, Jakobsson P, Kvarnstrom G. Screening for ocular dysfunction in children: approaching a common program. Acta Ophthalmol 1995;214(Suppl):39-40.
10. Dell W. The epidemiology of amblyopia. Prob Optom 1991;3:195-207.
11. Moore BD. Epidemiology of ocular disorders in young children. In: Moore BD, ed. Eye Care for Infants and Children. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997, 21-9.
12. Stayte M, Reeves B, Wortham C. Ocular and vision defects in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:228-32.
13. Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol 1996;41:3-30.
14. Schmidt PP. Principles of screening. In: Rosenbloom AA, Morgan MW, eds. Principles of Pediatric Optometry. Philadelphia: Lippencott, 1990:468-85.
15. Wasserman RC, Croft CA, Brotherton SE. Preschool vision screening in pediatric practice: a study from the Pediatric Research Office Settings (PROS) network. Pediatrics 1992;89:834-8.
16. Freedman HL, Preston KL. Polaroid photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. An improved methodology. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1785-95.
17. Drack AV, Stewart S, Scott WE, Bautista D, Bratton A. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors in a pre-school population. Cited in Freedman HL, Griffin L. Polaroid photoscreening: a new model and interpretation standards. Cedar Falls, IA: MTI, 1994.
18. Ottar WL, Scott WE, Holgado SI. Photoscreening for amblyogenic factors. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1995;32:289-95.
19. Morris CEA, Scott WE, Simon JW, Preston KL, Freedman HL. Unpublished. University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.
20. Freedman HL, Griffin L. Polaroid photoscreening: a new model and interpretation standards. Cedar Falls, IA: MTI, 1994.
21. Hulley SB, Cummings SR. Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiologic Approach. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989:216-20.
22. Blum HL, Peters HB, Bettman JW. Vision Screening for Elementary Schools; The Orinda Study. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959.
23. Lewis RC, Marsh-Tootle WL. The reliability of interpretation of photoscreening results with the off PS-100 in Headstart preschool children. J Am Optom Assoc 1995;66:429-34.
24. Rothman KJ. Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1986:195-207.
25. Cyert LA, Allen D, Ciner E, Dobson V, Maguire M, Moore BD, Orel-Bixler D, Schmidt P, Schultz J. Preschool Children's Vision Screening Study Group: NEI Planning Grant. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73(12s):93.
26. Nelson LB, Wagner RS, Simon JW, Harley RD. Congenital esotropia. Surv Ophthalmol 1987;31:363-83.
27. Maino DM. Diagnosis and Management of Special Populations. St. Louis: Mosby, 1995:1-54, 189-206.
28. Angi MR, Bergamo L, Bisantis C. The binocular videorefractoscope for visual screening in infancy (abstract). Ger J Ophthalmol 1993;2:182-8.
29. Bobier WR. Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:962-71.
30. Abramov I, Hainline L, Duckman RH. Screening infant vision with paraxial photorefraction. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:538-45.
31. Haegerstrom-Portnoy G. New Procedures for evaluating vision functions of special populations. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:306-14.
32. Hamer RD, Norcia AM, Day SH, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Lewis D, Hsu-Winges C. Comparison of on- and off-axis photorefraction with cycloplegic retinoscopy in infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1992;29:232-9.
33. Schmidt PP, Orel-Bixler D, Allen D, Ciner E, Cyert L, Dobson V, Maguire M, Moore B. Analytical comparisons of photorefraction in screening. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72(12s):209.
34. Shoemaker JA, Gedance S, Engle L. Training lay screening personnel to interpret photographs from the MTI Photoscreener®. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996;37:S111.
35. Marsh-Tootle WL, Corliss DA, Alvarez SL, Clore KA, Gordon A, Houston G, Perry FF, Swanson MW. A statistical analysis of modified clinical technique vision screening preschoolers by optometry students. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:593-603.
36. Ciner E, Cyert L, Dobson V, Maguire M, Moore B, Orel-Bixler D, Schmidt P, Schultz J. Vision disorders in preschool children, prevalence, and public health significance. Presented at: American Public Health Association, Annual Meeting, November 19, 1996, New York, NY.