Rhodinocichla roseaIs an Emberizid (Aves; Passeriformes) Based on Mitochondrial DNA Analyses

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 260-274

  Seutin, Gilles ^a   Bermingham, Eldredge ^a  

^a SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIRD; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; BIRDS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0031255176     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0426     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Check-list of North American Birds. 1983;Am. Ornithol. Union, Washington.
2. Avise J. C. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. 1994;Chapman & Hall, New York.
3. Avise J. C., Nelson W. S., Sibley C. G. DNA sequence support for a close phylogenetic relationship between some storks and New World vultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994a;5173-5177.
4. Avise J. C., Nelson W. S., Sibley C. G. Why one-kilobase sequences from mitochondrial DNA fail to solve the hoatzin phylogenetic enigma. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:1994b;175-184.
5. Bledsoe A. H. Nuclear DNA evolution and phylogeny of the New World nine-primaried oscines. Auk. 105:1988;504-515.
6. Brodkorb P. Origin and evolution of birds. Avian Biology. 1971;Academic Press, New York. p. 19-55.
7. Brown G. G., Simpson M. V. Novel features of animal mtDNA evolution as shown by sequences of two rat cytochrome oxidase subunit II genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 77:1982;3605-3609.
8. Brown W. M., Prager E. M., Wang A., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA sequences in primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 18:1982;225-239.
9. Capaldi R. A. Structure and function of cytochromec. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59:1990;569-596.
10. Clark G. A. Jr. Foot-scute differences among certain North American oscines. Wilson Bull. 86:1974;104-109.
11. Clark H. L. Note on the Panama thrush-warbler. Auk. 30:1913;11-15.
12. Demastes J. W., Remsen J. V. Jr. The genusCaryothraustes. Wilson Bull. 106:1994;733-738.
13. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome: A novel gene order in higher vertebrates. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;599-634.
14. Edwards S. V., Arctender P., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial resolution of a deep branch in the genealogical tree for perching birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 243:1991;99-107.
15. Eisenmann E. On the systematic position ofRhodinocichla rosea. Auk. 79:1962;640-648.
16. Feduccia A. The Age of Birds. 1980;Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge.
17. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. Annu. Rev. Genet. 22:1988;521-565.
18. J. Felsenstein, 1993, PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package, Univ. Washington, Seattle, WA.
19. Friday A. E. Models of evolutionary changes and the estimation of evolutionary trees. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 4:1987;61-88.
20. Gill F. B. Ornithology. 1990;Freeman, New York.
21. Hartlaub G. Beiträge zur exotischen ornithologie. J. Ornithol. 1:1853;30-44.
22. Hellmayr C. E. Catalogue of Birds of the Americas. 1936.
23. Hillis D. M., Huelsenbeck J. P. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83:1992;189-195.
24. 3and cytochromebo. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 25:1993;121-136.
25. I.B.I. 1993, MacVector 4.1; User's Manual, I.B.I. New Haven, CN.
26. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;128-144.
27. Isler M. L., Isler P. R. The Tanagers. Natural History, Distribution, and Identification. 1987;Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington.
28. Johnson N. K., Zink R. M., Marten J. A. Genetic evidence for relationships in the avian family Vireonidae. Condor. 90:1988;428-445.
29. Jukes T. H., Cantor C. R. Evolution of protein molecules. Munro H. N. Mammalian Protein Metabolism. 1969;21-132 Academic Press, New York.
30. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:1980;111-120.
31. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. 1983;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
32. Kishino H., Hasekawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;170-179.
33. Kondo R., Horai S., Satta Y., Takahata N. Evolution of hominoid mitochondrial DNA with special reference to the silent substitution rate over the genome. J. Mol. Evol. 36:1993;517-531.
34. Kornegay J. R., Kocher T. D., Williams L. A., Wilson A. C. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;367-379.
35. S. Kumar, K. Tamura, M. Nei, 1993, MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis, Pennsylvania State Univ. Philadelphia, PA.
36. Legendre L., Legendre P. Numerical Ecology. 1983;Elsevier, Amsterdam.
37. Lesson R.-P. Illustrations de zoologie, livre 2. 1832;A. Bertrand, Paris.
38. Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Hendy M. D., Penny D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;605-612.
39. Moore W. S. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution. 49:1995;718-726.
40. Nei M., Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the number of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:1986;418-428.
41. Nigro L., Solignac M., Sharp P. M. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in themelanogasterDrosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 33:1991;156-162.
42. Nunn G. B., Cooper J., Jouventin P., Robertson C. J. R., Robertson G. G. Evolutionary relationships among extant albatrosses (Procellariiformes: Diomedeidae) established from complete cytochrome-b. Auk. 113:1996;784-801.
43. Olson S. L. The fossil record of birds. Farner D. S., King J. S., Parkes K. C. Avian Biology. 1985;79-238 Academic Press, New York.
44. Palumbi S., Martin A. P., Romano S., McMillan W. O., Stice L., Grabowski G. The Simple Fool's Guide to PCR, version 2.0. 1991;Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu.
45. Raikow R. J. Appendicular myology and relationships of the New World nine-primaried oscines (Aves: Passeriformes). Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 7:1978;1-43.
46. Ridgway R. The birds of North and Middle America. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus. 50:1902;1-834.
47. Sclater P. L. Catalogue of the Passeriformes or Perching Birds in the Collection of the British Museum. 1886;British Mus. London.
48. Seutin G., White B. N., Boag P. T. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can. J. Zool. 68:1991;82-90.
49. Seutin G., Brawn J., Ricklefs R. E., Bermingham E. Genetic divergence among populations of a tropical passerine, the Streaked Saltator (Saltator albicollis. Auk. 110:1993;117-126.
50. Seutin G., Klein N. K., Ricklefs R. E., Bermingham E. Historical biogeography of the bananaquit (Coereba flaveola. Evolution. 48:1994;1041-1061.
51. Sharp P., Li W.-H. On the rate of DNA sequence evolution in Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 28:1989;398-402.
52. Sharpe R. B. Catalogue of Birds in the British Museum. 1881;Brit. Mus. London.
53. Sibley C. G., Ahlquist J. E. Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A Study in Molecular Evolution. 1990;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.
54. Skutch A. F. On the habits of the Queo,Rhodinocichla rosea. Auk. 79:1962;633-639.
55. Sneath P. H. A., Sokal R. R. Numerical Taxonomy. 1973;Freeman, San Francisco.
56. Storer R. W. What is tanager? Living Bird. 8:1967;127-136.
57. D. L. Swofford, 1993, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP), Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv. Champaign, IL.
58. Tsukihara T. Structure of metal sites of oxidized bovine heart cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8Å Science. 269:1995;1069-1074.
59. Tsukihara T. The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8Å Science. 272:1996;1136-1144.
60. Webster J. D. Skeletons and the genera of tanagers. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 98:1988;581-593.
61. Wetmore A. A classification for the birds of the world. Smithson. Misc. Coll. 139:1960;1-37.
62. Wolstenholme D. R. Animal mitochondrial DNA: Structure and evolution. Int. Rev. Cytol. 141:1992;173-216.
63. Zardoya R., Meyer A. Phylogenetic performance of mitochondrial protein-coding genes in resolving relationships among vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1996;933-942.
64. Zimmer R., Erdtmann B., Thomas W. K., Quinn T. W. Phylogenetic analysis of theCoscoroba coscoroba. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3:1994;85-91.