Influence of the addition of restorations on the diagnosis of caries from digitized bitewing radiographs

Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 443-448

  Sinton, J M ^a   Wood, R E ^a   Pharoah, M J ^a   Lewis, D W ^a  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNITY DENTISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING;

EID: 0031253985     PISSN: 10792104     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90046-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Grondahl HG. The Influence of observer performance in radiographic caries diagnosis. Swed Dent J 1979;3:102-7.
2. Grondahl HG. Radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions. Swed Dent J 1979;3:109-17.
3. Grondahl HG. Some factors influencing observer performance in radiographic caries diagnosis. Swed Dent J 1979;3:157-72.
4. Mileman P, Purdell-Lewis DJ, van der Weele LT. Variation in radiographic caries diagnosis and treatment decisions amongst university teachers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1982;10:329-34.
5. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Haugejordan O, Riordan PJ. Variation in radiographic interpretation and restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries among dentists in Norway. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985;13:26-9.
6. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnostic quality and observer variation in radiographic diagnoses of approximal caries. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:39-46.
7. Lewis DW, Kay EJ, Main PA, Pharoah MJ, Csima A. Dentists' variability in restorative decisions, microscopic and radiographic caries depth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:106-11.
8. Kay EJ, Knill-Jones R. Variation in restorative treatment decisions: application of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:113-7.
9. Doubilet P, Herman PG. Interpretation of radiographs: effect of clinical history. Am J Roentgenol 1981;137:1005-58.
10. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Doffman DD, et al. Tentative diagnoses facilitate the detection of diverse lesions in chest radiographs. Invest Radiol 1986;21:532-9.
11. Berbaum KS, EI-Khoury GY, Franken EA, Kathol M, Montgomery WJ, Hesson W. Impact of clinical history on fracture detection with radiography. Radiology 1988;168:507-11.
12. Norman GR, Brooks LR, Coblentz CL, Babcock CJ. The correlation of feature identification and category judgments in diagnostic radiology. Memory and Cognition 1992;20:344-55.
13. Goode BC, Cooperstein LA, De Marino GB et al. Does knowledge of the clinical history affect the accuracy of chest radiograph interpretation? Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:709-12.
14. Baders JD, Shugars DA. Variation in dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1992;52:102-10.
15. Pitts NB, Renson CE. Reproducibility of computer-aided image analysis estimates of the depth and area of radiolucencies in approximal enamel. J Dent Res 1985;64:1221-4.
16. Wenzel A, Larsen MJ, Fejerskov O. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs and digitized radiographs. Caries Res 1991;25: 365-71.
17. Pitts NB. Detection and measurement of approximal radiolucencies by computer-aided image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;58:358-66.
18. Mouyen F, Benz C, Sonnebend E, Lodter JP. Presentation and physical evaluation of radiovisiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:238-42.
19. Wood RE, Tai CE, Blenkinsop B, Johnston D. Digitised slice interposition in forensic dental radiographic identification. Am J Forens Med Pathol 1994;15:70-8.