|
Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 269-270
|
Corporate tyranny.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
BENEFICENCE;
BIOETHICS;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONSENSUS;
DECISION MAKING;
EDITORIAL;
FEMALE;
GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (GREAT BRITAIN);
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GROUP PROCESS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
SPERMATOZOON;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL (GREAT BRITAIN);
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
BENEFICENCE;
BIOETHICAL ISSUES;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONSENSUS;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
FEMALE;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MALE;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
SPERMATOZOA;
|
EID: 0031252847
PISSN: 03066800
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.5.269 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|