Perceptual Localization of Surface Position

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1481-1492

  Phillips, Flip ^b   Todd, James T ^c   Koenderink, Jan J ^a   Kappers, A M L ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0031252675     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.5.1481     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
2. DeValois, K. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., Nygaard, R., Schlussel, S., & Sladky, J. (1990). Discrimination of relative spatial position. Vision Research, 30, 1649-1660.
3. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1985). Parts of recognition. In S. Pinker (Ed.), Visual cognition (pp. 65-96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
4. Koenderink, J. J. (1989). Solid shape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doom, A. J. (1976). The singularities of the visual mapping. Biological Cybernetics, 24, 51-59.
6. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doom, A. J. (1980). Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Optica Acta, 27, 981-996.
7. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doom, A. J. (1982). Perception of solid shape and spatial lay-out through photometric invariants. Cybernetics and Systems Research, 943-948.
8. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
9. McKee, S. P., Levi, D. M., & Bowne, S. F. (1990). The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 137-151.
10. Norman, J. F., Lappin, J. S., & Zucker, S. W. (1991). The discriminability of smooth stereoscopic surfaces. Perception, 20, 789-807.
11. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 173-186.
12. Parsons, L. M. (1996). Inability to reason about an object's rotation orientation using an axis and angle of rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1259-1277.
13. Peachey, D. R. (1985). Solid texturing of complex surfaces. Computer Graphics, 19, 279-286.
14. Perlin, K. (1985). An image synthesizer. Computer Graphics, 19, 287-296.
15. Phillips, F., & Todd, J. T. (1996). Perception of local three-dimensional shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 930-944.
16. Reichel, F. D., Todd, J. T., & Yilmaz, E. (1995). Visual discrimination of local surface depth and orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1233-1240.
17. Richards, W. A., Koenderink, J. J., & Hoffman, D. D. (1987). Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 4, 1168-1175.
18. Rogers, B. J., & Graham, M. E. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
19. Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1986). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
21. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
22. Tittle, J. S., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V. J., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 663-678.
23. Todd, J. T., & Norman, J. F. (1995). The visual discrimination of relative surface orientation. Perception, 24.