Nuclear waste and future societies: A look into the deep future

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 155-170

  Hora, Stephen C ^a   Von Winterfeldt, Detlof ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; GEOLOGICAL REPOSITORIES; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PLANNING; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INADVERTENT INTRUSION;

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

NUCLEAR WASTE; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0031252035     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00075-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anderson, D. R., Marietta, M. G., and Bertram-Howery, S. G.: WIPP Performance Assessment: A 1990 Snapshot of Compliance with 40 CFR 191, Subpart B. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990.
2. Environmental Protection Agency: Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes: Final Rule. 40 CFR Par 191. Federal Register 50, 38066-38089 (1985).
3. Human Interference Task Force: Reducing the Likelihood of Future Human Activities That Could Affect Geologic High-Level Waste Repositories (ONWI-537), Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Columbus, OH, 1984.
4. Nuclear Energy Agency: Risk Associated with Human Intrusion as Radioactive Waste Disposal Site: Proceedings of an NEA Workshop. OECD, Paris, 1989.
5. Nuclear Energy Agency: Assessment of Future Human Actions at Radioactive Waste Disposal Sites: Draft Report of an NEA Working Group. OECD, Paris, 1993.
6. Nuclear Energy Agency: Systematic Approaches to Scenario Development. OECD, Paris, 1992.
7. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., and Lichtenstein, S.: Fault Trees: Sensitivity of Estimated Failure Probability to Problem Representation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4, 330-334 (1978).
8. Hora, S. C., and Iman, R. L.: Expert Opinion in Risk Analysis: The NUREG-1150 Methodology, Nuclear Science and Engineering 102, 323-331 (1989).
9. Morgan, M., Amaral, D., Henrion, M., and Morris, S.: Technological Uncertainly in Quantitative Policy Analysis - A Sulfur Pollution Example, Risk Analysis 3, 201-220 (1984).
10. Electric Power Research Institute: Seismic Hazard Methodology for the Central and Eastern United States, Vol. 1, Methodology. NP-4/26, 1986.
11. Keeney, R., and von Winterfeldt, D.: Eliciting Probabilities from Experts in Complex Technological Problems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38, 191-201 (1991).
12. Cooke, R. M.: Experts in Uncertainty. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.
13. Bonano, E. J., Hora, S. C., Keeney, R. L., and von Winterfeldt, D.: Elicitation and Use of Expert Judgment in Performance Assessment for High-Level Radioactive Waste Repositories. Sandia Report No. SAND89-1821, NUREG/CR-5411. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1989.
14. Hora, S. C., von Winterfeldt, D., and Trauth, K. M.: Expert Judgment on Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Sandia Report No. SAND90-3063. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991.
15. Guzowski, R. V.: Preliminary Identification of Scenarios That May Affect the Escape and Transport of Radionuclides from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. Sandia Report No. SAND89-7149. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990.