Inductive modeling of expert decision making in loan evaluation: A decision strategy perspective

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 83-98

  Kim, Choong N ^a   Chung, H Michael ^b,d   Paradice, David B ^c  

^a Hallym University   (South Korea)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision model; Decision strategy; Expert system; Induction; Knowledge acquisition

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

DECISION STRATEGY; INDUCTIVE MODELING METHODS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0031245594     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-9236(97)00022-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. C.J. Casey, Prior probability disclosure and loan officers' judgments: some evidence of the impact, J. Accounting Res. 21 (1) (1983) 300-307.
2. L.R. Goldberg, Man versus model of man: just how conflicting is that evidence?, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 16(1) (1976) 13-22.
3. J.W. Payne, Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 16 (2) (1976) 366-387.
4. I. Zimmer, A lens study of the prediction of corporate failure by bank loan officers, J. Accounting Res. 18 (2) (1980) 629-636.
5. K. Levi, Expert systems should be more accurate than human experts, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 19 (3) (1989) 647-657.
6. R. Libby, Man versus model of man: some conflicting evidence, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 16 (1) (1976) 1-12.
7. R. Michalski, A theory and methodology of inductive learning, in: R. Michalski, J. Carbonell, T. Mitchell (Eds.), Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Tioga Press, Palo Alto, 1983.
8. J. Quinlan, Discovering rules by induction from large collection of examples, in: D. Michie (Ed.), Expert Systems in Microelectronic Age, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1979, 169-201.
9. H. Braun, J. Chandler, Predicting stock market behavior through rule induction, Decision Sci. 18 (3) (1987) 415-429.
10. C. Carter, J. Catlett, Assessing credit card applications using machine learning, IEEE Expert 2 (5) (1987) 71-79.
11. H.M. Chung, M.S. Silver, Rule-based expert systems and linear models: an empirical comparison of learning-by-examples methods, Decision Sci. 23 (3) (1992) 687-707.
12. W. Messier, J. Hansen, Inducing rules for expert system development: an example using default and bankruptcy data, Manage. Sci. 34 (12) (1988) 1403-1415.
13. D. Michie, Current developments in expert systems, in: J. Quinlan (Ed.), Applications of Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley Publishing, NY, 1987.
14. M. Shaw, J. Gentry, Inductive learning for risk classification, IEEE Expert 4 (2) (1990) 47-53.
15. H.M. Chung, K.Y. Tam, A comparative analysis of inductive learning algorithms, Int. J. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 2 (1) (1994) 3-18.
16. K. Duliba, Contrasting neural nets with regression in predicting performance in the transportation industry, Proceedings of the HICSS, 1991, 163-170.
17. S. Dutta, S. Shekhar, Bond ratings: a non-conservative application of neural networks, Proc. ICNN 2 (1988) 443-450.
18. W. Raghupathi, L. Schkade, B. Raju, A neural network application for bankruptcy prediction, Proceedings of the HICSS, 1991, 147-155.
19. K.Y. Tam, M. Kiang, Managerial applications of neural networks: the case of bank failure predictions, Manage. Sci. 38 (7) (1992) 926-947.
20. C.N. Kim, Modeling Expert Decision Making in Bankruptcy Prediction: A Decision Strategy Perspective, Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1993.
21. L. Beach, T. Mitchell, A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies, Acad. Manage. Rev. 3 (3) (1978) 439-449.
22. J.W. Payne, Contingent decision behavior, Psychological Bull. 92 (2) (1982) 382-402.
23. O. Svenson, Process descriptions of decision making, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 23 (1) (1979) 86-112.
24. H. Einhorn, The use of nonlinear noncompensatory models in decision making, Psychological Bull. 77 (3) (1970) 221-230.
25. H. Einhorn, Use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 19 (1) (1971) 1-27.
26. R.W. Olshavsky, Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: a replication and extension, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 24 (3) (1979) 300-316.
27. R. Billings, S. Marcus, Measures of compensatory and non-compensatory models of decision behavior, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 31 (3) (1983) 331-352.
28. A. Afifi, V. Clark, Computer-aided Multivariate Analysis, Wadsworth, London, 1984.
29. J. Neter, W. Wasserman, M. Kutner, Applied Linear Regression Models, Richard D. Irwin, IL, 1989.
30. C. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communications, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27 (1948) 379-423.
31. D.H. Fisher, K.B. McKusick, An empirical comparison of ID3 and back-propagation, Technical Report CS-88-14, Dept. of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, 1989.
32. D. Rumelhart, G. Hinton, R. Williams, Learning internal representations by error propagation, in: D. Rumelhart, J. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing, MIT Press, MA, 1986.
33. R. Lippmann, An introduction to computing with neural nets, IEEE ASSP Mag. 4 (2) (1987) 4-22.
34. E. Brunswick, The Conceptual Framework of Psychology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1952.
35. A. Dudycha, J. Naylor, The effect of variations in the cue R-matrix upon the obtained policy equations of judges, Educational Psychological Measurement 26 (3) (1966) 583-603.
36. K. Hammond, C. Hursch, F. Todd, Analyzing the components of clinical inference, Psychological Rev. 71 (6) (1964) 438-456.
37. C. Hursch, K. Hammond, J. Hursch, Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies, Psychological Rev. 71 (1) (1964) 42-60.
38. L.R. Tucker, A suggested alternative formulation in the development of Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch, and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd, Psychological Rev. 71 (6) (1964) 458-530.
39. R.H. Ashton, The predictive ability criterion and user prediction models, Accounting Rev. 49 (4) (1974) 719-732.
40. R. Libby, Accounting and Human Information Processing: Theory and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981.
41. W.F. Wright, Properties of judgment models in a financial setting, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 23 (1) (1979) 73-85.
42. L.R. Goldberg, Man versus model of man: a rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences, Psychological Bull. 77 (5) (1970) 422-432.
43. C.R. Harris, An Expert Decision Support System for Auditor Going Concern Evaluation, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas, Arlington, 1989.
44. H.C. Kraemer, S. Thiemann, How Many Subjects?: Statistical Power Analysis in Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, 1987.
45. F.E. Harrell, K.L. Lee, A comparison of the discrimination of discriminant analysis and logistic regression under multivariate normality, in: P.K. Sen (Ed.), Biostatistics: in Bimedical, Public Health, and Environmental Sciences, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
46. Y.-H. Pao, Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Addison-Wesley Publishing, NY, 1989.
47. H. Einhorn, Expert measurement and mechanical combination, Organizational Behavior Human Performance 20 (2) (1972) 86-196.