메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 56, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 3897-3908

Scaling laws for noise-induced temporal riddling in chaotic systems

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS); DIFFUSION; ELECTRON ENERGY LEVELS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; NONLINEAR OPTICS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

EID: 0031245212     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.3897     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (14)

References (41)
  • 1
    • 85037208647 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • M. Field and M. Golubitsky, Symmetry in Chaos: A Search for Pattern in Mathematics, Art and Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992)
    • M. Field and M. Golubitsky, Symmetry in Chaos: A Search for Pattern in Mathematics, Art and Nature (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).
  • 6
    • 6144229366 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonlinearity 9, 703 (1996); NONLE5P. Ashwin, P. J. Aston, and M. Nicol, University of Surrey, Technical Report in Mathematics and Statistics, 1996 (unpublished);
    • (1996) Nonlinearity , vol.9 , pp. 703
    • Ashwin, P.1    Aston, P.J.2    Nicol, M.3
  • 12
    • 0001475002 scopus 로고
    • Y.-C. Lai and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. E 52, R3313 (1995); PLEEE8
    • (1995) Phys. Rev. E , vol.52 , pp. R3313
    • Grebogi, C.1
  • 20
    • 85037180083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The model system Eq. (1) has the property that the equation of motion in the invariant subspace (Formula presented) is independent of the bifurcation parameter. Ashwin and co-workers call such parameters normal parameters In reality there can be situations where this is not true. For systems whose dynamics in the invariant subspace is also influenced by the blowout-bifurcation parameter (Formula presented) our consideration in this paper applies if there is a chaotic attractor in the invariant subspace. As (Formula presented) is changed, the attractor itself can undergo bifurcations. Thus the transverse Lyapunov exponent (Formula presented) is not necessarily a smooth or even a continuous function of (Formula presented) in the vicinity of the blowout bifurcation, as is true for the plots of the Lyapunov exponents of typical chaotic systems versus some parameter. However, in general, we expect (Formula presented) to have a smooth envelope. Our results in this paper should hold with respect to the smooth envelope of the function (Formula presented) On the other hand, situations of normal parameters arise naturally in synchronization of identical coupled chaotic oscillators
    • In reality there can be situations where this is not true. For systems whose dynamics in the invariant subspace is also influenced by the blowout-bifurcation parameter (Formula presented) our consideration in this paper applies if there is a chaotic attractor in the invariant subspace. As (Formula presented) is changed, the attractor itself can undergo bifurcations. Thus the transverse Lyapunov exponent (Formula presented) is not necessarily a smooth or even a continuous function of (Formula presented) in the vicinity of the blowout bifurcation, as is true for the plots of the Lyapunov exponents of typical chaotic systems versus some parameter. However, in general, we expect (Formula presented) to have a smooth envelope. Our results in this paper should hold with respect to the smooth envelope of the function (Formula presented) On the other hand, situations of normal parameters arise naturally in synchronization of identical coupled chaotic oscillators.
  • 24
    • 85037205743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Explicit integration in Eq. (29) yields (Formula presented)where (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) are given by Eq. (15), (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) Note that (Formula presented) (Formula presented) in (Formula presented) are not poles. Therefore the only singularity in (Formula presented) is the square-root branch singularity contained in (Formula presented) and (Formula presented)
    • Explicit integration in Eq. (29) yields (Formula presented)where (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) are given by Eq. (15), (Formula presented) (Formula presented) (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) Note that (Formula presented) (Formula presented) in (Formula presented) are not poles. Therefore the only singularity in (Formula presented) is the square-root branch singularity contained in (Formula presented) and (Formula presented)
  • 25
    • 0001094629 scopus 로고
    • Superpersistent chaotic transients also occur in a variety of systems. See, for example, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 935 (1983); PRLTAO
    • (1983) Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol.50 , pp. 935
    • Grebogi, C.1    Ott, E.2    Yorke, J.A.3
  • 34
    • 85037191575 scopus 로고
    • 75, 1087 (1986);
    • (1986) , vol.75 , pp. 1087
  • 37
    • 0001836882 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E 53, R4267 (1996); PLEEE8
    • (1996) Phys. Rev. E , vol.53 , pp. R4267
  • 38
    • 85037223234 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 54, 321 (1996).
    • (1996) , vol.54 , pp. 321
  • 39
    • 0001296111 scopus 로고
    • The effect of noise on on-off intermittency has been investigated. See, for example, J. F. Heagy, N. Platt, and S. M. Hammel, Phys. Rev. E 49, 1140 (1994); PLEEE8
    • (1994) Phys. Rev. E , vol.49 , pp. 1140
    • Heagy, J.F.1    Platt, N.2    Hammel, S.M.3
  • 41
    • 0000062105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Y. Nagai and Y.-C. Lai, Phys. Rev. E 55, R1251 (1997). PLEEE8
    • (1997) Phys. Rev. E , vol.55 , pp. R1251
    • Nagai, Y.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.