Patient acceptance of high-field whole-body MR systems, open MR systems and dedicated MR systems for the extremities;Akzeptanz von Hochfeld-Ganzkorper-MR-Geraten, offenem MR-system und dediziertem Extremitatenscanner durch die Patienten

Radiologe

Volumn 37, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 778-784

  Heuck, A ^a   Bonel H ^a   Huber, A ^a   Muller Lisse G U ^a   Sittek, H ^a   Reiser, M ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dedicated MR systems; Magnetic resonance imaging; MR systems; Open MR systems; Patient acceptance; Subjective condition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LIMB; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT POSITIONING; WELLBEING; WHOLE BODY RADIATION; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTREMITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0031242351     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001170050282     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Brennan SC, Redd WH, Jacobsen PB, Schorr O, Heelan RT, Sze GK, Krol G, Peters BF, Morrisey JK (1988) Anxiety and panic during magnetic resonance scans. Lancet 2: 512-517
2. Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB (1996) Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. Saunders, Philadelphia
3. Flaherty JA, Hoskinson K (1989) Emotional distress during magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med 320: 467-468
4. Friday PJ, Kubal WS (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging improved patient tolerance utilizing medical hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn 33. 80-84
5. Heuck A, Hierl WD, Herschbach P, Gerhardt FP (1995) Die Befindlichkeit von Patienten bei der Magnetresonanztomographie. Röntgenpraxis 48: 349-352
6. Heuck A, Scheidler J, Holzknecht N, Gauger J, Sittek H, Reiser M (1995) Schnelle und ultraschnelle Sequenzen in der MRT des Beckens und Retroperitoneums. Radiologe 35: 934-936
7. Hierl WD (1995) Befindlichkeit von Patienten bei der Magnetresonanz-Tomographie. Dissertationsschrift, Technische Universität Munchen
8. Kanal F, Shellock FG, Talagala I (1990) Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 176: 593-606
9. Kilborn LC Labbe EE (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging scanning procedures: development of phobic response during scan and at one-month follow up. J Behav Med 13: 391-401
10. Martin JB, Ahles TA, Jeffery S (1991) The role of private body consciousness and anxiety in the report of somatic symptoms during magnetic resonance imaging. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 22: 3-7
11. Quick ME, Letendre AJ, Ciottone RA, Lingley JF (1989) Evaluation of three psychologic interventions to reduce anxiety during MR imaging. Radiology 173: 759-768
12. Quick ME, Kohmann LJ, Scalzetti EM, Szeverenyl NM, Panicek DM (1988) Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Radiology 170: 463-466
13. Reiser M, Semmler W (1997) Magnetresonanztomographie, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
14. Slifer K, Penn Jones K, Cataldo MF, Conner RT, Zerhouni EA (1991) Music enhances patients comfort during MR imaging. AJR 156: 403
15. Stark DD, Bradley WG (1992) Magnetic resonance imaging. Mosby Year Book, St. Louis
16. Thorp D, Owens RG, Whitehouse G, Dewey ME (1990) Subjective experience of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol 41. 276-278
17. Vogl T (1988) Einfluß der Kernspintomographie auf den menschlichen Organismus. Enke, Stuttgart