Cancellous bone architecture: Advantages of nonorthogonal trabecular alignment under multidirectional joint loading

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 979-983

  Pidaparti, R M V ^a   Turner, Charles H ^a,b,c  

^a Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE; JOINTS (ANATOMY); LOADS (FORCES); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

MULTIDIRECTIONAL JOINT LOADING; NONORTHOGONAL TRABECULAR ALIGNMENT; TRABECULAR BONE;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CANCELLOUS BONE; JOINT FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRESS; TRABECULAR BONE;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE AND BONES; HUMANS; JOINTS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0031240021     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00052-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Albright, J. A. and Brand, R. A. (1987) The Scientific Basis of Orthopaedics, p. 162. Appleton and Lange, Norwald, CT.
2. Biewener, A. A., Fazzalari, N. L., Konieczynski, D. D. and Baudinette, R. V. (1996) Adaptive changes in trabecular architecture in relation to functional strain patterns and disuse. Bone 19, 1-8.
3. Fyhrie, D. P. and Schaffler, M. B. (1994) Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 15, 105-109.
4. Gibson, R. F. (1994) Principles of Composite Material Mechanics, p. 53, 221. McGraw-Hill, New York,
5. Harrigan, T. P. and Mann, R. W. (1984) Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor. Journal of Materials 19, 761-767.
6. Hert, J. (1992) A new explanation of the cancellous bone architecture. Functional Development and Morphology. 2, 17-24.
7. Jones, R. M. (1975) Mechanics of Composite Materials, p. 53. McGraw-Hill, New York.
8. Kuo, A. D. and Carter, D. R. (1991) Computational methods for analyzing the structure of cancellous bone in planar sections. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 9, 918-931.
9. Mallick, P. K. (1993) Fiber-Reinforced Composites, pp. 142-144. Marcel Dekker, New York.
10. Murray, P. D. F. (1936) Bones. A Study of the Development and Structure of the Vertebrate Skeleton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Pagano, N. J. and Halpin, J. C. (1968) Influence of end constraint in the testing of anisotropic bodies. Journal of Composite Materials 2, 18-31.
12. Pipes, R. B. and Pagano, N. J. (1982) Interlaminar stresses in composite laminates under uniform axial extension. Journal of Composite Materials 4, 538-548.
13. Snyder, B. D., Cheal, E. J., Hipp, J. A. and Hayes, W. C. (1989) Anisotropic structure-property relations for trabecular bone. Transactions of Orthopedic Research Society 14, 265.
14. Tarnopol'skii, Yu. M. and Kincis, T. (1985) Static Test Methods for Composites, p. 50-52. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York, NY.
15. Tsai, S. W. and Hahn, H. T. (1980) Introduction to Composite Materials, p. 69. Technomic Publishing Co., Lancaster, PA.
16. Turner, C. H., Cowin, S. C., Rho, J. Y., Ashman, R. B. and Rice, J. C. (1990) The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. Journal of Biomechanics 23, 549-561.
17. Turner, C. H., Anne, V. and Pidaparti, R. M. V. (1992) Prediction of proximal femoral architecture using the isotropic strain criterion. Proceedings of the 2nd North American Congress on Biomechanics, p. 363.
18. Wolff, J. (1986) The Law of Bone Remodeling (Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen, Kirschwald, 1892). Translated by Maquet, P. and Furlong, R., Springer, Berlin.