Noise, feedback training, and visual inspection performance

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 223-230

  Gramopadhye, Anand K ^a   Wilson, Kim ^a  

^a Clemson University   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Feedback; Inspection; Noise

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

FEEDBACK TRAINING; VISUAL INSPECTION PERFORMANCE;

ERGONOMICS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; INDUSTRY; MALE; NOISE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; STANDARD; TRAINING;

EID: 0031239865     PISSN: 01698141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00051-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Annett, J., 1966. Training for perceptual skills. Ergonomics, 9: 459-468.
2. Chin, R.T., 1988. Automated visual inspection: 1981 to 1987. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 41: 346-381.
3. Czaja, S.J. and Drury, C.G., 1981. Training programs for inspection. Human Factors, 23: 473-484.
4. Drury, C.G., 1978. Integrating human factors in statistical quality control. Human Factors, 20(5): 561-567.
5. Drury, C.G. and Addison, S.L., 1973. An industrial study of the effects of feedback and fault density on inspection performance. Ergonomics, 16: 159-169.
6. Drury, C.G. and Sinclair, M.A., 1983. Human and machine performance in an inspection task. Human Factors, 25: 391-399.
7. Embrey, D.E., 1975. Approaches to training for industrial inspection. Applied Ergonomics, 10: 139-144.
8. Gawron, V., 1982. Performance effects of noise intensity, psychological set and task type and complexity. Human Factors, 24: 225-243.
9. Gramopadhye, A.K., Drury, C.G. and Sharit, J., 1993. Training for decision making in aircraft inspection. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Nashville, 1261-1265.
10. Green, D.M. and Swets, J.A., 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Pyschophysics. Wiley, New York.
11. Lintern, G. and Wickens, C.D., 1987. Attention theory as a basis for training research. Aviation Research Laboratory Technical Report ARL-87-2/NASA-87-3, University of Illinois.
12. Loeb, M. and Alluisi, E.A., 1984. Theories of vigilance. In: J.S. Warm (Ed.), Sustained Attention in Human Performance. Wiley, Chichester.
13. Lysaght, R.J., Warm, J.S., Dember, W.N. and Loeb, M., 1984. Effects of noise and information processing demands on vigilance performance in men and women. In: A. Mitai (Ed.), Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. Mane, A. and Wickens, C.D., 1986. The effects of task difficulty and workload on training. Proc. Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting, Santa Monica, CA, 1124-1127.
15. Mackworth, J.F., 1964. The effect of true and false knowledge of results on the detectability of signals in a vigilance task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 18: 106-117.
16. McGrath, J.J., 1963. Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. In: D.N. Buckner and J.J. McGrath, Vigilance: A Symposium. Wiley, New York.
17. McNichol, D., 1972. Primer on signal detection theory. Allen and Urwin, London.
18. Megaw, E.D., 1979. Factors affecting visual inspection. Applied Ergonomics, 10(1): 27-32.
19. Micalizzi, J. and Goldberg, G., 1989. Knowledge of results in visual inspection decisions: Sensitivity or criterion effect. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 4: 225-235.
20. Murphy, T.J., 1975. Ergonomic Design for People at Work. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
21. Noonan, T.K., Ash, D. and Leob, M., 1985. Task complexity, subject sex and noise meaningfulness as determinants of cognitive vigilance performance. In: R.E. Eberts and C.G. Eberts (Eds.), Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors II. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 181-187.
22. Robertson, G., 1987. Automatic optical inspection of printed circuit boards during assembly. SME Vision Conference Proceedings, 11: 59-67.
23. Sheehan, J.J. and Drury, C.G., 1971. The analysis of industrial inspection. Applied Ergonomics, 2(2): 74-78.
24. Swets, J.A. (Ed.), 1964. Signal Detection Theory and Recognition by Human Observers: Contemporary Readings. Wiley, New York.
25. Wallack, P.M. and Adams, S.K., 1969. The utility of signal detection theory in the analysis of industrial inspection accuracy. AIIE Transactions, 1: 33-44.
26. Wiener, E.L., 1975. Individual and group differences in inspection. In: C.G. Drury and J.G. Fox (Eds.), Human Reliability in Quality Control. Taylor and Francis, London.
27. Williges, R.C., 1973. Manipulating the response criterion in visual monitoring. Human Factors, 15: 179-185.