Cardiomyoplasty: Hemodynamic benefit to normal and depressed canine left ventricular function

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 1997, Pages

  Chiang, Benjamin B Y ^a   Ali, Ahsan T ^a   Unger, Lauren S ^a   Slater, A David ^a,b   Santamore, William P ^a  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b Rudd Heart and Lung Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; CARDIOLOGY; HEMODYNAMICS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; MUSCLE; PRESSURE EFFECTS;

CARDIOMYOPLASTY; LATISSIMUS DORSI MUSCLE; LEFT VENTRICLE;

CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY;

NITROUS OXIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA FLOW; CALCULATION; CARDIOMYOPLASTY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; MALE; NONHUMAN; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ANIMALS; CARDIOMYOPLASTY; DOGS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HEART FAILURE, CONGESTIVE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING, MYOCARDIAL; MALE; SKELETAL MUSCLE VENTRICLE; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 0031238939     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Magovern GJ, Simpson KA: Clinical cardiomyoplasty: Review of the Ten-year United States Experience. Ann Thorac Surg 61: 413-419, 1996.
2. Stevenson LW, Perioff JK: The dilated cardiomyopathies. Clinical Aspects, in: Perloff JK, (ed), Cardiology clinics: The cardiomyopathies, vol 2, Philadelphia, WB Sanders Co, 1988 p. 187-218.
3. Erdman S, Strasberg B, Invernizzi C, Fiandra O, Moreira LF, Stolf NAG: Physiological principles and characteristics of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle II. A therapeutic option. J Cardiovasc Surg 35(Suppl 1-6): 153-159, 1994.
4. Hagege AA, Desnos M, Chachquew JC, et al: Preliminary report: follow-up after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Lancet 335: 1122-1124, 1990.
5. Kratz JM, Johnson WS, Mukherjee R, Hu J, Crawford FA, Spinale FG: The relation between latissimus dorsi skeletal muscle structure and contractile function after cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107: 868-878, 1994.
6. Chachques JC, Grandjean PA, Schwartz K, et al: Effects of latissimus dorsi dynamic cardiomyoplasty on ventricular function. Circulation 78(Suppl III): III203-III216, 1988.
7. Geddes LA, Janas W, Bourland JD, Cook J, Hinds M: The importance of timing muscle contraction in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16: 2255-2265, 1993.
8. Andersoon WA, Anderson JS, Acker MA, et al: Skeletal muscle grafts applied to the heart: a word of caution. Circulation 78(suppl III): III180-III190, 1988.
9. Thelin S, Vedung S, Nylung U, Thorelius J: Experimental dynamic cardiomyoplasty in sheep. Scan J Thorac Surg 26: 1-7, 1992.
10. Chagas ACP, Oreria LFP, DA Luz PL, et al: Stimulated preconditioned skeletal muscle cardiomyoplasty: an effective means of cardiac assist. Circulation 80(suppl III): III202-III208, 1989.
11. Kao RL, Chrustukeb IY, Magovern GJ, Park SB, Magovern GJ, Jr: The importance of skeletal muscle fiber orientation for dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 134-140, 1990
12. Niinami H, Pochettino A, Ruggiero R, et al: Canine latissiomus dorsi cardio-double myoplasty: Acute feasibility study. J Card Surg 6(Suppl 1): 124-131, 1991.
13. Locas CMHB: Hemodynamic study following cardiomyoplasty: Comparison of different stimulation protocols, in The use of the latissimus dorsi muscle for cardiac assist, the Nederlands, Universitaire Pers Maastricht, Proefschrift Maastricht, 1992, p. 70-89.
14. Lange R, Sack RU, Saggau W, Vahl C, Desimone R, Hagl S: Performance of dynamic cardiomyoplasty related to the functional state of the heart. J Card Surg 6: 225-235, 1991.
15. Lucas CM, van der Veen FH, Cheriex EC, Lorusso R, Havewith M, Penn OCKM, Wellens HJJ: Long-term follow-up (12-35 weeks) after dynamic cardiomyoplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22: 758-767, 1993.
16. El Okay RM, Jarvis JC, Barman D, et al: Factors affecting the integrity of latissimus dorsi muscle grafts: Implications for cardiac assistance from skeletal muscle. J Heart Lung Transplant 14: 359-365, 1995.
17. 7. Moreira LFP, Bocchi EA, Stolf NAG, Pileggi F, Jatene AD: Current expectation in dynamic cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 55: 299-303, 1993.
18. Isoda S, Yano Y, Jin Y, Walters III HL, Kondo J, Matsumoto A: Influence of a delay on latissimus dorsi muscle flap blood flow. Ann Thorac Surg 59: 632-638, 1995.
19. Carroll SM, Carroll CMA, Stremel RW, Heilman SJ, Tobin GR, Barker JH: Vascular delay of the latissimjs dorsi muscle: An essential component of cardiomyoplasty. Ann Thorac Surg 63: 1034-1040, 1997.
20. You J, Landymore RW, Fris J: Effect of cardiomyoplasty on systolic and diastolic function. Eur J Card Thorac Surg 9: 672-677, 1995.