|
Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 253-258
|
Cochlear Implants and the Claims of Culture? A Response to Lane and Grodin
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES;
ARTICLE;
CHILD;
COCHLEA PROSTHESIS;
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;
DISABLED PERSON;
ETHICS;
GENERAL ASPECTS OF DISEASE;
GENETIC COUNSELING;
HEALTH;
HEARING DISORDER;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
MINORITY GROUP;
MORALITY;
PARENT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
SURGERY;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
CHILD;
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;
CULTURAL DIVERSITY;
DISABLED PERSONS;
DISEASE;
EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES;
ETHICS;
GENETIC COUNSELING;
HEALTH;
HEARING DISORDERS;
HUMANS;
MINORITY GROUPS;
MORAL OBLIGATIONS;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PARENTS;
RISK;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY;
SOCIAL VALUES;
SURGERY;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
|
EID: 0031234504
PISSN: 10546863
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1353/ken.1997.0022 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (3)
|