The evaluation of text quality: Expert-focused and reader-focused methods compared

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 224-234

  Lentz, Leo ^a   De Jong, Menno ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Empirical research; Expert focused text evaluation; Problem prediction; Reader focused text evaluation

Indexed keywords

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EXPERT FOCUSED TEXT QUALITY EVALUATION; READER FOCUSED TEXT QUALITY EVALUATION;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0031233170     PISSN: 03611434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/47.649557     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. K. A. Schriver, "Evaluating text quality: The continuum from text-focused to reader-focused methods," IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun., vol. 32, pp. 239-255, 1989.
2. M. Dieli, "Designing successful documents: An investigation of document evaluation methods," Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, 1986.
3. J. H. Swaney et al. "Editing for comprehension: Improving the process through reading protocols," in Plain Language: Principles and Practice, E. R. Steinberg, Ed. Detroit, MI: Wayne State Univ. Press, 1991, pp. 173-203.
4. L. Lentz and H. Pander Maat, "Evaluating text quality: Reader-focused or text-focused?" in Studies of Functional Text Quality, H. Pander Maat and M. Steehouder, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi, 1992, pp. 101-114.
5. K. A. Schriver, "Document design as rhetorical action," Inaugural lecture, Utrecht University, 1995.
6. M. D. T. de Jong and L. R. Lentz, "Expert judgments versus reader feedback: A comparison of text evaluation techniques," J. Tech. Writing and Commun., vol. 26, pp. 507-519, 1996.
7. W. de Haas, "Research for government information campaigns: Not a final judgment but a management tool," in Government Information in The Netherlands, J. Katus and W. F. Volmer, Eds. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Vermande, 1994, pp. 123-136.
8. M. D. T. de Jong and P. J. Schellens, "Toward a valid design for pretesting and revising leaflets," in Functional Communication Quality, L. van Waes, E. Woudstra, and P. van den Hoven, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi, 1994, pp. 104-114.
9. D. M. W. de Vet, "Technical writing in the Netherlands," J. Tech. Writing and Commun., vol 26, pp. 537-546, 1996.
10. M. D. T. de Jong and P. J. Schellens, "De pretest als schakel in het tekstontwerpproces" (The pretest as a link in the Document Design process), Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, vol. 16, pp. 227-241, 1994.
11. R. A. Virzi, "Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: How many subjects is enough?" Human Factors, vol. 34, pp. 457-468, 1992.
12. L. Baker, "How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension," in Metacognition, Cognition and Human Performance, D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, and T. G. Waller, Eds. New York: Academic, 1985, pp. 155-206.
13. _, "Metacognition, comprehension monitoring and the adult reader," Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 1, pp. 3-38, 1989.
14. L. Bainbridge, "Verbal protocol analysis," in Evaluation of Human Work. A Practical Ergonomics Methodology, J. R. Wilson and E. N. Corlett, Eds. London, U.K.: Taylor and Francis, 1990, pp. 161-179.
15. K. A. Schriver, "Teaching writers to anticipate the reader's needs: Empirically based instruction," Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, 1987.
16. R. Mack and F. Montaniz, "Observing, predicting and analyzing usability problems," in Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, Eds. New York: Wiley, 1994, pp. 295-339.
17. K. A. Schriver, "Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs: What can document designers learn from usability testing?" in Studies of Functional Text Quality, H. Pander Maat and M. Steehouder, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi, 1992, pp. 141-157.
18. L. Lentz and H. Pander Maat, "Wat mankeert er aan die tekst? De evaluatie van voorlichtingsteksten over subsidieregelingen" ("What is wrong with that text? Evaluation of public information texts on subsidy regulations"), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Thesis Publishers, 1993.
19. K.A. Schriver, "Document design from 1980 to 1989: Challenges that remain," Tech. Commun., vol. 36, pp. 316-331, 1989.