An analysis of Spanish bien as a marker of classroom management in teacher-student interaction

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 337-354

  De Fina, Anna ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031232340     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-2166(97)00003-9     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barrois, Jean Pierre, 1981. Étude du fonctionnement de 'bien' dans certains énoncés en Français comparés à leur traduction en Anglais. Contrastes 2: 47-54.
2. Bauhr, Gerhard, 1994. Funciones discursivas de bueno en español moderno. Linguística Española Actual, XVI,1: 70-124.
3. Blakemore, Diane, 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Carranza, Isolda, 1992. Las expresiones pragmáticas en la conversación espontánea. Washington, DC: ERIC, ED362014.
5. Cazden, Courtney, B., 1988. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heineman.
6. Cortés Rodríguez, Luis, 1991. Sobre conectores, expletivos y muletillas en el español hablado, Málaga: Librería Agorá.
7. Dorr-Bremme, Donald, W., 1990. Contextualization cues in the classroom. Language in Society 19: 379-102.
8. Erickson, Frederick and John Schultz, 1981. When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In: J. Green and C. Wallat, eds., Ethnography and language in educational settings, 147-160. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Fraser, Bruce, 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 383-395.
10. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, 1993a. Comportamiento discursivo de bueno, bien, pues bien. E.L.U.A. 9: 205-221.
11. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, 1993b. Conclusivos y reformulativos. Verba 20, 171-198.
12. Gerhardt, Julie and Charles Stinton, 1994. The nature of therapeutic discourse: Accounts of the self. Journal of Narrative and Life History 4: 151-191.
13. Greasley, Peter, 1994. An investigation into the use of the particle well: Commentaries on a game of snooker. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 477-494.
14. Green, Judith and Cynthia Wallat, 1981. Mapping instructional conversations - A sociolinguistic ethnography. In: J. Green and C, Wallat, eds., Ethnography and language in educational settings, 161-205. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Gumperz, John, 1992. Contextualization revisited. In: P. Auer and A. Di Luzio, eds., The contextualization of language, 39-53. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Heritage, John, 1984a. A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placing. In: J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299-345, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Heritage, John, 1984b. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. New York: Polity Press.
18. Heritage, John and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 1994. Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences. And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23: 1-29.
19. Jucker, Andreas, H., 1993. The Discourse Marker well: A relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 435-452.
20. Kasper, Gabriele, 1985. Repair in foreign language teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7: 200-215.
21. Lakoff, Robin, 1973. Questionable answers and answerable questions. In: B. Kachru et al., eds., Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henri and Renee Kahane, 453-467. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois Press.
22. Levinson, Steven C., 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17(5-6): 365-399.
23. McHoul, Alec, 1978. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7: 183-213.
24. McHoul, Alec, 1990. The organization of classroom talk. Language in Society 19: 349-377.
25. Mehan, Hugh, 1979. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Mehan, Hugh, 1985. The stucture of classroom discourse. In: T.A. van Dijk, ed., Handbook of discourse analysis, Voil. 3: 119-130. London: Academic Press.
27. Owen, Marion, 1981. Conversational units and the use of well. In: P. Werth, ed., Conversation and discourse, 99-116. London: Croom Helm.
28. Portolés Lázaro, José, 1993. La distinción entre los conectores y otros marcadores del discurso en Español. Verba 20: 141-170.
29. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson, 1974. A simple systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
30. Schegloff, Emanuel, A., Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks, 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361-382.
31. Schiffrin, Deborah, 1985. Conversational coherence: The role of well. Language 61: 640-667.
32. Schiffrin, Deborah, 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Schourup, Lawrence C., 1982. Common discourse markers in English conversation. New York: Garland.
34. Sinclair, John and Malcolm R. Coulthard, 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Longman.
35. Tannen, Deborah and Cynthia Wallat, 1987. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 205-216.
36. Van Lier, Leo A., 1988. The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
37. Van Baardewyk Resseguier, J., 1991. Les particles de modalité wet et bien: une approche contrastive Néerlandais-Français. Cahiers de Lexicologie 59: 39-49.
38. Wierzbicka, Anna, 1986. Introduction to special issue on Particles. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 519-534.
39. Wilson, John, 1993. Discourse marking and accounts of violence in Northern Ireland. Text 13: 455-475.
40. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1958. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.