External reviews: What is being done?

Journal of Accounting Education

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 531-547

  Schwartz, Bill N ^a   Schroeder, Richard G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031231833     PISSN: 07485751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0748-5751(97)00023-7     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Brown, L. & Gardner, J. (1985). Applying citation analysis to evaluate the research contributions of accounting faculty and doctoral programs. The Accounting Review, April, 262-277.
2. Hasselback, J. R. (1995). Accounting Faculty Directory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Howard, T. & Nikolai, L. (1983). Attitude measurement and perceptions of accounting faculty publication outlets. The Accounting Review, October, 765-776.
4. Jolly, S. A., Schroeder, R. G. & Speer, R. K. (1995). An empirical investigation of the relationship between journal quality ratings and promotion and tenure decisions. Accounting Educators' Journal, Fall, 47-68.
5. Poston, L. (1984). Neither bane nor boon: External reviewing in the tenure and promotion process. ADE Bulletin, Spring, 44-46.
6. Schroeder, R. G., Payne, D. D. & Harris, D. G. (1988). Perceptions of accounting publication outlets: A further analysis. Accounting Educators' Journal, Fall, 1-17.
7. Williams, P. F. (1985). A descriptive analysis of authorship in The Accounting Review. The Accounting Review, April, 300-313.
8. Zirkel, P. A. (1985). Faculty review in the promotion and tenure process beyond the departmental level Planning for Higher Education, 13(4), 15-17.