Dynamics of pseudorabies virus infections in vaccinated pig populations: A review

Veterinary Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 117-122

  Stegeman, A ^a   de Jong, M C M ^a   van Nes, A ^b   Bouma, A ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; PSEUDORABIES; PSEUDORABIES HERPETOVIRUS; REVIEW; SWINE; SWINE DISEASE; THEORETICAL MODEL; VACCINATION;

ANIMALS; HERPESVIRUS 1, SUID; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PSEUDORABIES; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; VACCINATION;

EID: 0031227672     PISSN: 01652176     EISSN: 18755941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01652176.1997.9694754     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Becker NG. Analysis of infectious disease data. New York, Chapman and Hall Ltd 1989: 139–74.
2. Bouma A, Jong MCM de, and Kimman TG. Transmission of pseudorabies virus within populations is independent of the size of the population. Prey Vet Med 1995; 23: 163–72.
3. Bouma A, Jong MCM de, and Kimman TG. Transmission of two pseudorabies virus strains, that differ in virulence and virus excretion, in groups of vaccinated pigs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 43–7.
4. Bouma A, Jong MCM de, and Kimman TG. The influence of maternal immunity on the transmission of pseudorabies virus and on the effectiveness of vaccination. Vaccine; in press.
5. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek JAP, and Metz JAJ. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio RO in models of infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. J Math Biol 1990; 28: 365–82.
6. Jong MCM de, and Kimman TG. Experimental quantification of vaccine-induced reduction in virus transmission. Vaccine 1994; 12: 761–6.
7. Jong MCM de, Diekmann O, and Heesterbeek JAP. The computation of Ro for discrete-time epidemic models with dynamic heterogeneity. Math Biosci 1994; 119: 97–114.
8. Jong MCM de, Diekmann O, and Heesterbeek JAP. How does transmission depend on population size? In: ‘Epidemic models: their structure and relation to data’, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1995: 84–94.
9. Kimman TG. Characterization of the pseudorabies virus-specific immunoglobulin M response and evaluation of its diagnostic use in pigs with preexisting immunity to the virus. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31: 2309–14.
10. Leeuw PW de, and Oirschot JT van. Vaccines against Aujeszky’s disease: evaluation of their efficacy under standardized laboratory conditions. Vet Quart 1985; 7: 191–7.
11. Metz JAJ. The epidemic in a closed population with all susceptibles equally vulnerable; some results for large susceptible populations and small initial infections. Acta Biotheoretica 1978; 27: 75–123.
12. Moormann RJM, Rover T de, Briaire J, Peeters BPII, Gielkens AU, and Oirschot JI van. Inactivation of the thymidine kinase gene of a gl deletion mutant of pseudorabies virus generates a safe but still highly immunogenic vaccine strain. J Gen Virol 1990; 71: 1591–97.
13. Nes A van, Stegeman JA, Jong MCM de, Loeffen WL, Kimman TG, and Verheijden JHM. No major outbreaks of pseudorabies virus in sow herds vaccinated with strain 783 with adjuvant. Vaccine 14, 1042–4.
14. Nes A van, Jong MCM de, and Verheijden JHM. Modeling pseudorahies virus within and between herds: Implications for eradication. Proc 911 meeting of the Dutch Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics. Wageningen, 1996, 45–9.
15. Oirschot JT van. Intranasal vaccination of pigs against Aujeszky’s disease: comparison with one or two doses of attenuated vaccines in pigs with high maternal antibody titres. Res Vet Sci 1987; 42: 12–6.
16. Oirschot JT van. Induction of antibodies to glycoprotein 1 in pigs exposed to different doses of a mildly virulent strain of Aujeszky’s disease virus. Vet Rix: 1988; 122, 599–603.
17. Oirschot JT van, and Gielkens AIJ Intranasal vaccination of pigs against pseudorabies: Absence of vaccinal virus latency and failure to prevent latency of virulent virus. Am J Vet Res 1984; 45: 2099–103.
18. Oirschot JT van, Gielkens AU, Moormann RJM, and Berns AJM. Marker vaccines, virus protein-specific antibody assays and the control of Aujeszky’s disease. Vet Microbiol 1990; 23: 85–101.
19. Pensaert MB, Smet K de, Wade K de. Extent and duration of virulent virus excretion upon challenge of pigs vaccinated with different glycoprotein-deleted Aujeszky’s disease vaccines. Vet Microbiol 1990; 22: 107–17.
20. Smet K de, Wade K de, and Pensaert MB. Virulent Aujeszky’s disease virus infectious dose in vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs. In: Proc 12th Int Pig Vet Soc Congr, The Hague, the Netherlands 1992: 65.
21. Smith G, and Grenfell T. Population biology of pseudorabies in swine. Am J Vet Res 1990; 51: 148–55.
22. Stegeman JA, Ticlen MJM, Kimman TG, Oirschot JT van, Hunneman WA, and Berndsen FW. Intensive regional vaccination with a gl-deleted vaccine markedly reduces pseudorabies virus infections. Vaccine 1994; 12: 527–31.
23. Stegeman A, Nes A van, Jong MCM de, and Bolder FWM. Assessment of the effectiveness of vaccination against pseudorabies in finishing pigs. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 573–8.
24. Vannier P, liutet E, Bourgueil E, and Cariolet R. Level of virulent virus excreted by infected pigs previously vaccinated with different glycoprotein deleted Aujcszky’s disease vaccines. Vet Microbiol 1991; 29: 213–23.
25. Wittmann G, Ohlinger V, and Hahn U. Multiplication of Aujcszky’s disease virus after experimental infection with high and low doses of virus. Zentralbl. Veteriniirmed. [B] 1982; 29: 24-30 (in German, English summary).