Adhesion-dependent F-actin pattern in Amoeba proteus as a common feature of amoebae and the metazoan motile cells

Cell Biology International

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 565-573

  Grȩbecka, Lucyna ^a   Pomorski, Paweł ^a   Grȩbecki, Andrzej ^a   Łopatowska, Anna ^a  

^a NENCKI INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Amoeba proteus; Cell adhesion; Cell nucleus; F actin organization

Indexed keywords

F ACTIN; FLUORESCEIN ISOTHIOCYANATE; PHALLOIDIN;

AMOEBA PROTEUS; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL NUCLEUS; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; METAZOON; NONHUMAN; STAINING;

AMOEBA PROTEUS; METAZOA; PROTOZOA;

EID: 0031227467     PISSN: 10656995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/cbir.1997.0181     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amato PA, Unanue ER, Taylor DR. Distribution of actin in spreading macrophages: A comparative study on living and fixed cells. J Cell Biol. 96:1983;750-761.
2. Bell LGE, Jeon KW. Locomotion ofAmoeba proteus. Nature. 198:1963;675-676.
3. Berlin DR, Oliver JM. Analogous ultrastructure and surface properties during capping and phagocytosis in leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 77:1978;789-804.
4. Boyles J, Bainton DF. Changing patterns of plasma membrane-associated filaments during the initial phases of polymorphonuclear leukocyte adherence. J Cell Biol. 82:1979;347-368.
5. Carley WW. F-actin aggregates in transformed cells contain alfa-actinin and fimbrin but apparently lack tropomyosin. Eur J Cell Biol. 39:1985;313-320.
6. Carley WW, Barak LS, Webb WW. F-actin aggregates in transformed cells. J Cell Biol. 90:1981;797-802.
7. Carley WW, Webb WW. F-actin aggregates may activate transformed cell surfaces. Cell Motil. 3:1983;383-390.
8. Carley WW, Lipsky MG, Webb WW. Regulation and drug insensitivity of F-actin association with adhesion areas of transformed cells. J Cell Physiol. 17:1983;257-265.
9. 125. Indian J Exp Biol. 22:1984;457-459.
10. Christiani A, Hügelmeyer P, Stockem W. Morphological evidence for the existence of a more complex cytoskeleton inAmoeba proteus. Cell Tiss Res. 246:1986;163-168.
11. Clark AM. Some effects of removing the nucleus from amoebae. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 20:1942;240-247.
12. Cramer L, Mitchison TJ. Moving and stationary actin filaments are involved in the spreading of postmitotic PtK2 cells. J Cell Biol. 122:1993;833-843.
13. Cramer L, Mitchison TJ, Theriot JA. Actin-dependent motile forces and cell motility. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 6:1994;682-686.
14. Fukui Y, Inoué S. Amoeboid movement anchored by eupodia, new actin-rich knobby feet inDictyostelium. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 36:1997;339-354.
15. Fukui Y, Murray Y, Riddelle KS, Soll DR. Cell behavior and actomyosin organization inDictyostelium. Cell Struct Funct. 16:1991;289-301.
16. Gingell D, Owens N. How do cells sense and respond to adhesive contacts? Diffusion-trapping of lateraly mobile membrane proteins at maturing adhesions may initiate signals leading to local cytoskeletal assembly response and lamella formation. J Cell Sci. 101:1992;255-266.
17. Grain J. The cytoskeleton in Protists: Nature, structure and functions. Int Rev Cytol. 104:1986;153-249.
18. Grebecka L. Polarity of the motor functions inAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool. 27:1988;83-96.
19. Grȩbecka L, Pomorski P, Łopatowska A. Differences in the motility ofAmoeba proteus. Cell Biol Int. 19:1995;847-854.
20. Grebecka L, Pomorski P, Łopatowska A. Adhesion to the substratum improves the motility ofAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma, 197: 174-181. 1997.
21. Grebecki A. Co-axial motion of the semi-rigid cell frame inAmoeba proteus. Acta Protozool. 15:1976;221-248.
22. Grebecki A. Relative motion inAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma. 123:1984;116-134.
23. Grebecki A. Relative motion inAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma. 127:1985;31-45.
24. Grȩbecki A. Membrane and cytoskeleton flow in motile cells with emphasis on the contribution of free-living amoebae. Int Rev Cytol. 148:1994;37-80.
25. Haberey M. Bewegungsverhalten und Untergrundkontakt vonAmoeba proteus. Mikroskopie. 27:1971;226-234.
26. Harris AK. Locomotion of tissue culture cells considered in relation to amoeboid locomotion. Int Rev Cytol. 150:1994;35-68.
27. King CA, Westwood R, Cooper L, Preston TM. Speed of locomotion of the soil amoebaNaegleria gruberi. Protoplasma. 99:1979;323-334.
28. King CA, Preston TM, Miller RH, Grose C. The cell surface in amoeboid locomotion - studies on the role of cell-substrate adhesion. Cell Biol Int Rep. 6:1982;893-900.
29. King CA, Preston TM, Miller RH. Cell-substrate interactions in amoeboid locomotion - a matched reflection interference and transmission electron microscopy study. Cell Biol Int Rep. 7:1983;641-649.
30. KŁopocka W, KoŁodziejczyk J, Łopatowska A, Grȩbecki A. Relationship between pinocytosis and adhesion inAmoeba proteus. Cell Biol Int. 20:1996;635-641.
31. KoŁodziejczyk J, KŁopocka W, Łopatowska A, Grebecka L, Grebecki A. Resumption of locomotion byAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma. 189:1995;180-186.
32. Korohoda W, Kajstura J. Motile activities in polynuclear products of cell fusion. I. Actin rearrangements in spreading on glass polycaryons formed from Ehrlich ascites tumour cells. Protoplasma (Suppl. 1). 1988;89-95.
33. Kukulies J, Ackermann G, Stockem W. Pinocytosis and locomotion in amoebae. XIV. Demonstration of two different receptor sites on the cell surface ofAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma. 131:1984;233-243.
34. Lorch IJ. The rate of attachment to the substratum: A study of nuclear-cytoplasmic relationship. J Cell Physiol. 73:1969;171-177.
35. Marchisio PC, Cirillo D, Naldini L, Primavera MV, Teti A, Zambonin-Zallone A. Cell-substratum interaction of cultured avian osteoclasts is mediated by specific adhesion structures. J Cell Biol. 99:1984;1696-1705.
36. Marchisio PC, Cirillo D, Teti A, Zambonin-Zallone A, Tarone G. Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibro-blasts and cells of monocytic origin display a peculiar dot-like organization of cytoskeletal proteins involved in microfilament-membrane interactions. Exp Cell Res. 169:1987;202-214.
37. Ono M, Murakami T, Tomita M, Ishikawa H. Confocal laser microscopy of cytoskeleton and cell-adhesion of glass adherent mouse peritoneal macrophages. Cell Struct Funct. 16:1991;591-591.
38. Ono M, Murakami T, Tomita M, Ishikawa H. Association of the actin cytoskeleton with glass-adherent proteins in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Biol Cell. 77:1993;219-230.
39. Opas M. Interference reflection microscopy of adhesion ofAmoeba proteus. J Microscopy. 112:1978;215-221.
40. Opas, M, 1987, The transmission of force between cells and their environment. In, Cytomechanics, Springer, Berlin, 273, 285.
41. Opas M. Substratum mechanics and cell differentiation. Int Rev Cytol. 150:1994;119-137.
42. Preston TM, King CA. An experimental study of the interaction between the soil amoebaNaegleria gruberi. J Cell Sci. 34:1978;145-158.
43. Preston TM, O'Dell DS. The cell surface in amoeboid locomotion: behaviour ofNaegleria gruberi. J Gen Microbiol. 116:1980;515-520.
44. Prusch RD. The influence of concanavalin A and cytochalasin B on pinocytotic activity inAmoeba proteus. Protoplasma. 106:1981;223-230.
45. Southwick FS, Dabiri GA, Paschetto M, Zigmond SH. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte adherence induces actin polymerization by a transduction pathway which differs from that used by chemoattractants. J Cell Biol. 109:1989;1561-1569.
46. Stockem W, KŁopocka W. Ameboid movement and related phenomena. Int Rev Cytol. 112:1988;137-183.
47. Topf PM, Stockem W. Protein and lipid composition of the cell surface complex fromAmoeba proteus. Eur J Protistol. 32:1996;156-170.
48. Trotter JA. The organization of actin in spreading macrophages. Exp Cell Res. 132:1981;235-248.
49. Wang JS, Pavlotski N, Tauber AI, Zaner KS. Assembly dynamics of actin in adherent human neutrophils. Cell Motil Cytoskel. 26:1993;340-348.
50. Way M, Weeds A. Cytoskeletal ups and downs. Nature. 344:1990;292-293.
51. Weber I, Wallraff E, Albrecht R, Gerisch G. Motility and substratum adhesion ofDictyostelium. J Cell Sci. 108:1995;1519-1530.
52. Willingham MC, Yamada KM, Yamada SS, Pouyssegur J, Pastan I. Microfilament bundles and cell shape are related to adhesiveness to substratum and are dissociable from growth control in cultured fibroblasts. Cell. 10:1977;375-380.
53. Yamada KM, Geiger B. Molecular interactions in cell adhesion complexes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 9:1997;76-85.
54. Yürüker B, Niggli V. Alfa-actinin and vinculin in human neutrophils: Reorganization during adhesion and relation to the actin network. J Cell Sci. 101:1992;403-414.