Sensitivity of partial rescreening in cervical cytology

Acta Cytologica

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 1631-1632

  Coleman, Dulcie V ^a   Baker, R ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cervical smears; Mass screening; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; VAGINA SMEAR;

CYTODIAGNOSIS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0031226866     PISSN: 00015547     EISSN: 19382650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Faraker CA: Partial rescreening as a quality assurance method (lett). Acta Cytol 1996;40:1323
2. Mitchell H, Medley G: Differences between Papanicolaou smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology 1995;6:368-375