Confidentiality: A critique of the traditional view

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 403-406

  Glen, Sally ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dialogue; Partnership; Power

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPATHY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PATERNALISM; PATIENT RIGHT; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; REVIEW;

PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPATHY; ETHICS, NURSING; HUMANS; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ACCESS TO RECORDS; PATIENT RIGHTS; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0031226479     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/096973397677513224     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Shardlow S. Confidentiality, accountability and the boundaries of client-worker relationships. In: Hugman R, Smith D eds. Ethical issues in social work. London: Routledge, 1995: 64-83.
2. Ouretveit J. Improving social work record and practice: report of the BASW/BIOSS Action Research Project into Social Work Recording and Client Participation. Birmingham: British Association of Social Workers, 1986.
3. Raymond Y. Empowerment in practice. Practice (BASW) 3 (1): 5-21.
4. Doel M, Lawson B. Open records: the client's right to partnership. Br J Soc Work 1986; 16: 407-30.
5. Hugman R. Power in caring professions. London: Macmillan.