Visual and semantic support for paired-associates recall in young and older adults

Journal of Genetic Psychology

Volumn 158, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 347-355

  Sharps, Matthew J ^a   Antonelli, Janeen R S ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SEMANTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS;

EID: 0031225498     PISSN: 00221325     EISSN: 19400896     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221329709596673     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arbuckle, T. Y., Cooney, R., Milne, J., & Melchior, A. (1994). Memory for spatial layouts in relation to age and schema typicality. Psychology and Aging, 9, 467-480.
2. Birren, J. E. (1974). Translations in gerontology—From lab to life: Psychophysiology and the speed of response. American Psychologist, 29, 808-815.
3. Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67-83.
4. Cherry, K. E., & Park, D. C. (1993). Individual difference and contextual variables influence spatial memory in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 517-526.
5. Christensen, K. J., Moye, J., Armson, R. R., & Kern, T. M. (1992). Health screening and random recruitment for cognitive aging research. Psychology and Aging, 7, 204-208.
6. Craik, F I. M, (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities, mechanisms, and performances (pp. 409-422). Amsterdam: North Holland-Elsevier.
7. Craik, F I. M„ & Jennings, J. M. (1992). Human memory. In F I. M. Craik & T A. Salt- house (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 51-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Dror, I. E., & Kosslyn, S. M (1994). Mental imagery and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9, 90-102.
9. Nebes, R. D. (1990), Semantic-memory function and dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. In T. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 265-296), Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Park, D. C., Cherry, K. E., Smith, A. D., & Lafronza, V. N. (1990). Effects of distinctive context on memory for objects and their locations in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 250-255.
13. Salthouse, T. A. (1995). Differential age-related influences on memory for verbal-symbolic information and visual-spatial information. Journal of Gerontology: Psychology cal Sciences, 50B, P193-P201.
14. Sharps, M. J. (1991). Spatial memory in young and elderly adults: Category structure of stimulus sets. Psychology and Aging, 6, 309-312.
15. Sharps, M. J., & Gollin, E. S. (1987). Memory for object locations in young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 336-341.
16. Sharps, M. J., & Gollin, E. S. (1988). Aging and free recall for objects located in space. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43, P8-P11.
17. Sharps, M. J., & Martin, S. (1996, April). Spatial memory in young and older adults: Relative influence of environmental support at encoding and retrieval. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference, Atlanta, GA.
18. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory; 6, 174-215.