Extremes for shot noise processes with heavy tailed amplitudes

Journal of Applied Probability

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 643-656

  McCormick, William P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Extreme values; Renewal processes; Shot noise; Weak convergence

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

RENEWAL PROCESSES; WEAK CONVERGENCE;

SHOT NOISE;

EID: 0031224138     PISSN: 00219002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021900200101317     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BEIRLANT, J. AND TEUGELS, J. L. (1992) Modeling large claims in non-life insurance. Insurance: Math. Econ. 11, 17-29.
2. BINGHAM, N. H., GOLDIE, C. H. AND TEUGELS, J. L. (1987) Regular Variation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. CHERNICK, M. R., HSING, T. AND McCORMICK, W. P. (1991) Calculating the extremal index for a class of stationary sequences. Adv. Appl. Prob. 25, 835-850.
4. CLINE, D. (1983) Infinite series of random variables with regularly varying tails. Tech. report 83-24. University of British Columbia.
5. DONEY, R. A. AND O'BRIEN, G. L. (1991) Loud shot noises. Ann. Appl. Prob. 1, 88-103.
6. HOLDEN, H. V. (1976) Models for Stochastic Activity of Neurones (Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 12). Springer, Berlin.
7. HOMBLÉ, P. AND MCCORMICK, W. P. (1995) Weak limit results for the extremes of a class of shot noise processes. J. Appl. Prob. 32, 707-726.
8. HSING, T. (1987) On the characterization of certain point processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 26, 297-316.
9. HSING, T. (1993) On some estimates based on sample behavior near high level excursions. Prob. Theory Rel. Fields 95, 331-356.
10. HSING, T., HÜSLER, J. AND LEADBETTER, M. R. (1988) On the exceedance point process for stationary sequences. Prob. Theory Rel. Fields 78, 97-112.
11. HSING, T. L. AND TEUGELS, J. L. (1989) Extremal properties of shot noise processes. Adv. Appl. Prob. 21, 513-525.
12. JENSEN, J. L. (1991) Saddlepoint approximations to the distribution of the total claim amount in some recent risk models. Scand Act. J. 154-168.
13. KALLENBERG, O. (1976) Random Measures. Academic Press, New York.
14. LAWRANCE, A. J. AND KOTTEGODA, H. T. (1977) Stochastic modelling of riverflow time series. J. R. Statist. Soc. A 140, 1-14.
15. REISS, R. (1993) A Course on Point Processes. Springer, New York.
16. RESNICK, S. I. (1987) Extreme Values, Regular Variation, and Point Processes. Springer, New York.
17. RESNICK, S. I. (1992) Adventures in Stochastic Processes. Birkhäuser, Boston.
18. WAYMIRE, E. AND GUPTA, V. K. (1981a) The mathematical structure of rainfall representations 1. A review of the stochastic rainfall models. Water Resources Res. 17, 1261-1272.
19. WAYMIRE, E. AND GUPTA, V. K. (1981b) The mathematical structure of rainfall representations 2. A review of the theory of point processes. Water Resources Res. 17, 1273-1285.
20. WAYMIRE, E. AND GUPTA, V. K. (1981c) The mathematical structure of rainfall representations 3. Some applications of the point process theory to rainfall processes. Water Resources Res. 17, 1287-1294.
21. WEISS, G. (1973) Filtered Poisson processes as models for daily streamflow data. PhD thesis. Imperial College, London.
22. WEISS, G. (1974) Shot noise models for synthetic generation of multisite daily streamflow data. In Design of Water Resource Projects with Inadequate Data. Vol. 1. IAHS. pp. 457-467.