|
Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 25-29
|
Death and the court.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
BEHAVIOR;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MICROCLIMATE;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
ROE V. WADE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
CRUZAN V. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
ROE V. WADE;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
ADULT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE OF LIFE;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0031219025
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3527800 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|