|
|
Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 29-34
|
|
Assisted suicide, the Supreme Court, and the constitutive function of the law.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ASSISTED SUICIDE;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INTRACTABLE PAIN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MENTAL STRESS;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHILOSOPHY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
UNITED STATES;
VACCO V. QUILL;
VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
VACCO V. QUILL;
WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG;
EMPIRICAL RESEARCH;
EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
PAIN, INTRACTABLE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSONS;
PHILOSOPHY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
SUICIDE, ASSISTED;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE OF LIFE;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
|
|
EID: 0031218947
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3527801 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (3)
|
|
References (0)
|
