|
Volumn 27, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 12-15
|
Ban cloning? Why NBAC is wrong.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
ARTICLE;
BIOETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLONING;
CLONING HUMAN BEINGS (NBAC);
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL RESEARCH;
NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
POLICY;
POLITICS;
RECOMBINANT DNA ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
RESEARCH;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
U.S. CONGRESS;
UNITED STATES;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
CLONING HUMAN BEINGS (NBAC);
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
NATIONAL BIOETHICS ADVISORY COMMISSION;
RECOMBINANT DNA ADVISORY COMMITTEE;
U.S. CONGRESS;
ADVISORY COMMITTEES;
BIOETHICS;
BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH;
CLONING, ORGANISM;
CULTURAL DIVERSITY;
EMBRYO RESEARCH;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMANS;
POLITICS;
PRIVATE SECTOR;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RESEARCH;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0031216795
PISSN: 00930334
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3527794 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|