Comparison of community annoyance from railway noise evaluated by different category scales

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Volumn 205, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 505-511

  Yano, T ^a   Yamashita, T ^b   Izumi, K ^c  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ARIAKE NATIONAL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c MURORAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NOISE POLLUTION; RAILROADS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COMMUNITY RESPONSE; NOISE ANNOYANCE;

ACOUSTIC NOISE;

EID: 0031209096     PISSN: 0022460X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1018     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. T. J. SCHULTZ 1978 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64, 377-405. Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance.
2. J. M. FIELDS and J. G. WALKER 1982 Journal of Sound and Vibration 81, 51-80. Comparing the relationships between noise level and annoyance in different surveys: A railway noise vs. aircraft and road traffic comparison.
3. F. L. HALL 1984 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76, 1161-1168. Community response to noise: Is all noise the same?
4. K. D. KRYTER 1982 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 72, 1222-1252. Community annoyance from aircraft and ground vehicle noise.
5. J. M. FIELDS 1984 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75, 447-467. The effects of numbers of noise events on people's reactions to noise: An analysis of existing survey data.
6. U. MOEHLER 1988 Journal of Sound and Vibration 120, 321-332. Community response to railway noise: A review of social surveys.
7. R. F. S. JOB 1988 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83, 991-1001. Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction.
8. S. FIDELL, T. SCHULTZ and D. M. GREEN 1991 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 221-223, Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise.
9. D. M. GREEN and S. FIDELL 1991 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 234-243. Variability in the criterion for reporting annoyance in community noise surveys.
10. J. M. FIELDS 1993 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93, 2753-2763. Effect of personal and situational variables on noise annoyance in residential areas.
11. J. IGARASHI 1992 Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 13, 301-309. Comparison of community response transportation noise: Japanese results and annoyance scale.
12. N. LEVINE 1981 Journal of Sound and Vibration 74, 265-279. The development of an annoyance scale for community response assessment.
13. K. FURIHATA and T. YANAGISAWA 1988 Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 44, 108-115. Reconstruction of vehicle noise-rating scale based on judgment of residents in and around Nagano City and its effectiveness (in Japanese).
14. K. FURIHATA and T. YANAGISAWA 1989 Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 45, 577-582. Investigation on composition of a rating scale possible common to evaluate psychological effects on various kinds of noise sources (in Japanese).
15. J. M. FIELDS 1995 Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, 89-92. Proposed guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys.
16. J. M. FIELDS 1996 Proceedings of Internoise '96, Liverpool. Progress toward the use of shared noise reaction question.
17. T. YAMASHITA, T. YANO and A. KOBAYASHI 1994 Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan 50, 215-226. An experimental study on an annoyance scale for noise assessment (in Japanese).
18. K. IZUMI, W. DANKITTIKUL, T. YAMASHITA and T. YANO 1994 Proceedings of Internoise '94, Yokohama, 1145-1148. Cross-cultural study on community response to traffic noise (1): Surveys in Songkhla, Thailand and Tomakomai, Japan.
19. T. YANO, K. IZUMI, R. RYLANDER and M. BJÖRKMAN 1994 Proceedings of Internoise '94, Yokohama, 1149-1152. Cross-cultural study on community response to traffic noise (2): Surveys in Gothenburg, Sweden and Kumamoto, Japan.