Infants' Recognition of Contour-Deleted Figures

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1206-1216

  Rose, Susan A ^b   Jankowski, Jeffery J ^c   Senior, Graeme J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0031203913     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.4.1206     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arterberry, M. E. (1993). Development of spatial temporal integration in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 343-364.
2. Bertenthal, B. I., Campos, J. J., & Haith, M. M. (1980). Development of visual organization: The perception of subjective contours. Child Development, 51, 1072-1080.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-418.
5. Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38-64.
6. Cave, C. B., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1993). The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification. Perception, 22, 229-248.
7. Colombo, J. ( 1993). Infant cognition: Predicting later intellectual functioning. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Colombo, J., & Mitchell, D. W. (1990). Individual differences in early visual attention: Fixation time and information processing. In J. Colombo & J. Fagen (Eds.), Individual differences in infancy: Reliability, stability, and prediction (pp. 193-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Ghim, H. R. (1990). Evidence of perceptual organization in infants: Perception of subjective contours by young infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 13, 221-248.
10. Johnson, S. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Perception of object unity in 2-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 31, 739-745.
11. Johnson, S. P., & Nanez, J. E., Sr. (1995). Young infants' perception of object unity in two-dimensional displays. Infant Behavior and Development, 18, 133-143.
12. Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
13. Kellman, P. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
14. Kellman, P. J., Spelke, E. S., & Short, K. R. (1986). Infant perception of object unity from translatory motion in depth and vertical translation. Child Development, 57, 72-86.
15. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
16. Lowe, D. G. (1985). Perceptual organization and visual recognition. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
17. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
18. Rose, S. A. (1988). Shape recognition in infancy: Visual integration of sequential information. Child Development, 59, 1161-1176.
19. Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., & Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260-267.
20. Skouteris, H., McKenzie, B. E., & Day, R. H. (1992). Integration of sequential information for shape perception by infants: A developmental study. Child Development, 63, 1164-1196.
21. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set. Perceptual and Motor Skills Monograph, 67(Suppl. 1), 1-36.
22. Snodgrass, J. G., Smith, B., Feenan, K., & Corwin, J. (1987). Fragmenting pictures on the Apple Macintosh computer for experimental and clinical applications. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 19, 270-274.
23. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. A. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for naming agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
24. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
25. Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-389.
26. Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972-974.
27. Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological Science, 4, 336-341.