Detection of Newborn Aneuploidy by Interphase Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization

Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Volumn 72, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 705-710

  Syed, M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 13; CHROMOSOME 18; CHROMOSOME 21; DNA PROBE; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENETICS; HUMAN; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPING; NEWBORN; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANEUPLOIDY; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 13; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 18; CHROMOSOMES, HUMAN, PAIR 21; DNA PROBES; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERPHASE; KARYOTYPING; X CHROMOSOME; Y CHROMOSOME;

EID: 0031203167     PISSN: 00256196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(11)63588-x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Day DW, Jalal SM, Sinclair-Worley L, Kukolich M, Freeman M, Sakakini J. Direct chromosome analysis from neonatal cord blood. Am J Med Genet 1988;31:943-946
2. Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, McGuire NM, Dackowski WR, Weinstein M, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies in fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:854-865
3. Philip J, Bryndorf T, Christensen B. Prenatal aneuploidy detection in interphase cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). PrenatDiagn 1994;14:1203-1215
4. Jalal SM, Law ME, Dewald GW. Atlas of Whole Chromosome Paint Probes: Normal Patterns and Utility for Abnormal Cases. Rochester (MN): Mayo Foundation; 1996
5. Spurbeck JL, Zinsmeister AR, Meyer KJ, Jalal SM. Dynamics of chromosome spreading. Am J Med Genet 1996; 61:387-393
6. Liehr T, Thoma K, Kammler K, Gehring C, Grehl H, Ekici A, et al. Direct preparation of uncultured EDTA-treated or heparinized blood for interphase FISH analysis. Appl Cytogenet 1995;21:185-188
7. von Kap-herr C, Kelly TE, Golden WL. Uncultured blood smears hybridized with alpha satellite probes to diagnose 45,X in spontaneously aborted fetuses. Am J Med Genet 1992;44:394-397
8. Burns J, Chan VT, Jonasson JA, Fleming KA, Taylor S, McGee JO. Sensitive system for visualising biotinylated DNA probes hybridised in situ: rapid sex determination of intact cells. JClinPathol 1985;38:1085-1092
9. Maeda T, Ohno M, Matsunobu A, Yoshihara K, Yabe N. A cytogenetic survey of 14,835 consecutive liveborns. Jpn J Hum Genet 1991;36:117-129
10. Whiteman DAH, Klinger KW. Efficiency of rapid in situ hybridization methods for prenatal diagnosis of chromosome abnormalities causing birth defects [abstract]. Am J Hum Genet 1991;49(Suppl):234
11. Rhoads GG, Jackson LG, Schlesselman SE, de la Cruz FF, Desnick RJ, Golbus MS, et al. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. N Engl J Med 1989;320:609-617
12. Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, Parner J, Carelli MP, Ward BE, et al. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. Am J Hum Genet 1996;59:918-926
13. Dewald GW, Schad CR, Christensen ER, Law ME, Zinsmeister AR, Stalboerger PG, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with X and Y chromosome probes for cytogenetic studies on bone marrow cells after opposite sex transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 12:149-154
14. Schad CR, Hanson CA, Paietta E, Casper J, Jalal SM, Dewald GW. Efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization for detecting PMLIRARA gene fusion in treated and untreated acute promyelocytic leukemia. Mayo Clin Proc 1994;69:10471053
15. Schad CR, Kuffel DG, Wyatt WA, Zinsmeister AR, Jenkins RB, Dewald GW, et al. Application of fluorescent in situ hybridization with X and Y chromosome specific probes to buccal smear analysis. Am J Med Genet 1996;66:187-192