Current methods of measuring ulcers: A review

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 87, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 358-359

  Houghton, Elissa ^a   Kippen, Cameron ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FOOT ULCER; HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STANDARD;

FOOT ULCER; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WEIGHTS AND MEASURES;

EID: 0031201197     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/87507315-87-8-358     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. GRIFFEN J, TOLLEY E, TOOMS R, ET AL: A comparison of photographic and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area. Phys Ther 73: 117, 1993.
2. CUTLER N, GEORGE R, SEIFERT R, ET AL: Comparison of qualitative methodologies to define chronic pressure ulcer management. Decubitus 6: 22, 1993.
3. ETRIS MB, FRIBBLE J, LA BRECQUE J: Evaluation of two wound measurement methods in a multi-centre controlled study. Ostomy Wound Manage 40: 44, 1994.
4. JOHNSON J: Using ulcer surface area and volume to document wound size. JAPMA 85: 91, 1995.
5. PLASSMAN P, MELHUISH J, HARDING K: Methods of measuring wound size: a comparative study. Ostomy Wound Manage 40: 50, 1994.