Falling generation costs, environmental externalities and the economics of electricity conservation

Energy Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 1997, Pages 845-860

  Parfomak, Paul W ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Electricity; Externalities

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITY COSTS;

COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COST ACCOUNTING; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES;

ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; EXTERNALITY EFFECT; PRODUCTION COSTS;

USA;

EID: 0031200904     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(97)00075-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anonymous (1995) 'Power marketing' Electric World September, 16
2. Bailey, J (1995). Business bulletin: electric utilities. The Wall Street Journal, November, 16, 1
3. Beamon, J A and Wade, S H (1996) 'Energy equipment choices: fuel costs and other determinants' Monthly Energy Review Energy Information Administration, Washington DC
4. Burns, R E, Pollard, W, Pryor, T and Pike, L M (1982) The Appropriateness and Feasibility of Various Methods of Calculating Avoided Costs. National Regulatory Research Institute, Columbus, OH
5. Chernick, P and Caverhill, E (1989) The Valuation of Externalities from Energy Production, Delivery, and Use: Fall, 1989 Update For Boston Gas Co. Boston, PLC, Inc. December 22 (as cited in Ottinger et al, 1990)
6. Cifuentes, L A and Lave, L B (1993) 'Economic valuation of air pollution abatement: benefits from health effects' Annual Review of Energy and Environment 18, 319-342 (CMU study)
7. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1996) Annual Energy Outlook 1996 US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
8. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1995a) Financial Statistics of Major U.S. Investor-Owned Electric Utilities 1994 US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
9. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1995b) Electric Sales and Revenue 1994 US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
10. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1995c) Inventory of Power Plants in the United States 1994 US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
11. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1995d) Annual Energy Review 1994 US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
12. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (1995e) Natural Gas Annual 1994 Vol 2. US Department of Energy, Washington, DC
13. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) (1995) FERC Form No. 1: Annual Report of Major Electric Utilities, Licensees and Others Annual filings, Washington, DC
14. Freeman, A M, III and Krupnick, A J (1992) 'Externality adders: a response to Joskow' The Electricity Journal pp 61-63. August/ September
15. Gellings, C and McMenamin, J S (1993) DSM: What's Real, What's Not, and How We Can Tell the Difference Electric Power Research Institute and Regional Economic Research, Inc, Palo Alto, CA. July
16. Hirst, E, Cavanagh, R, & Miller, P (1996). The future of DSM in a restructured US electricity industry. Energy Policy, 24(4), 303-315.
17. Joskow, P L (1992) 'Weighing environmental externalities: let's do it right!' The Electricity Journal pp 53-67. May
18. Lovins, A B (1996). Negawatts: twelve transitions, eight improvements, and one distraction. Energy Policy, 24(4), 331-343.
19. Martin, E T, Toulson, D A and Chamberlin, J H (1994) Analysis of Hydro - Québec's Long-Term Avoided Cost Method Barakat and Chamberlin, Inc, Oakland, CA. February
20. Miller, R H (1983) Power System Operation. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
21. Nadel, S, & Geller, H (1996). Utility DSM: What have we learned? Where are we going?. Energy Policy, 24(4), 289-302.
22. Naill, R F and Van den Berg, A J (1992) 'Environmental externalities in utility planning' Presentation at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Assoc, Kansas City June 21-26
23. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) (1988) Innovative Clean Coal Technology: Programmatic Environmental Impact Analysis (PEIA) Prepared for US Dept. of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, Oak Ridge, TN. September (as cited in Ottinger et al 1990)
24. Palmer, K, Krupnick, A, Dowlatabadi, H, & Siegel, S (1995). Social costing of electricity in Maryland: effects on pollution, investment and prices. The Energy Journal, 16(6), 1-25.
25. Rosenfeld, A, Atkinson, C, Koomey, J, Meier, A, Mowris, R J, & Price, L (1993). Conserved energy supply curves for US buildings. Contemporary Policy Issues, 11, 45-68.
26. Wood, A J and Wollenberg, B F (1984) Power Generation, Operation and Control John Wiley and Sons, New York