Conjoint measurement approach for machine-part grouping in manufacturing cell formation

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 2237-2252

  Mukhopadhyay, S K ^a   Bhandari, C ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING NITIE   (India)

^b DCL   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROCESS CONTROL; PRODUCTION CONTROL; SCHEDULING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

MANUFACTURING CELL FORMATION;

COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 0031200230     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002075497194822     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Askin, R. G. and Chiu, K. S., 1990, A graph partitioning procedure for machine assignment and cell formation in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 28 (8), 1955-1972.
2. Bedworth, D. D., Henderson, M. R. and Wolf, P. M., 1991, Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing (New York: McGraw Hill).
3. Boe, W. J. and Cheng, C. H., 1991, A close neighbour algorithm for designing cellular manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Research, 29 (10), 2097-2116.
4. Burbidge, J. L., 1983, Production flow analysis. Production Engineer, 42 (12), 742-752.
5. Burbidge, J. L., 1975, The Introduction to Group Technology (New York: Wiley).
6. Chandrasekharan, M. P. and Rajagopalan, R., 1986, An ideal seed non-hierarchial clustering algorithm for cellular manufacturing, International Journal of Production Research, 24 (2), 451-463.
7. Chandrasekharan, M. P. and Rajagopalan, R., 1987, ZODIAC - an algorithm for concurrent formation of part families and machine cells. International Journal of Production Research, 25 (6), 835-850.
8. Chandrasekharan, M. P. and Rajagopalan, R., 1989, Groupability: an analysis of the properties of binary data matrices for group technology, International Journal of Production Research, 27 (6), 1035-1052.
9. Coombs, C. H. and Komorita, S. S., 1958, Measuring utility of money through decisions. American Journal of Psychology, 71 (8), 383-389.
10. Grahams, I. and Jones, P. L., 1988, Expert System Knowledge, Uncertainty and Decisions (London: Chapman & Hall).
11. Green, P. E. and Rao, V. R., 1971, Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (8), 353-363.
12. King, J. R., 1980, Machine-component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using a rank order clustering algorithm, International Journal ofProduction Research, 18 (2), 213-232.
13. King, J. R. and Nakornchai, V., 1982, Machine-component group formation in group technology: review and extension. International Journal of Production Research, 20 (2), 117-133.
14. Krantz, D. H., 1964, Conjoint measurement: the Luce-Tukey axiomatization and some extensions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1 (7), 1-27.
15. Kruskal, J. B., 1965, Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 27 (3), 251-263.
16. Lingoes, J. C., 1967, An IBM-7090 program for Guttmann-Lingoes conjoint measurement. Behavioural Science, 12 (11), 501-502.
17. Loung, L. H. S., 1993, A cellular similarity co-efficient algorithm for the design of manufacturing cells. International Journal of Production Research, 31 (8), 1757-1766.
18. Luce, D. R. and Tukey, J. W., 1964, Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1 (2), 1-27.
19. MeAuley, J., 1972, Machine grouping for efficient production, Production Engineer, 51 (2), 53-57.
20. Mosier, C. and Taube, L., 1985a, The facets of group technology and their impacts on implementation-a state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 13 (5), 381-391.
21. Mosier, C. and Taube, L., 1985b, Weighted similarity measure heuristics for the group technology machine clustering problem. Omega, 13 (6), 577-583.
22. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Sarkar, P. and Panda, R. P., 1994, Machine-component grouping in cellular manufacturing by multidimensional scaling. International Journal of Production Research, 32 (2), 457-477.
23. Mukhopadhyay, S. K., Gopalakrishnan, A. and Kripalini, M. K., 1995, Moments based clustering techniques for manufacturing cell formation. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (4), 1091-1115.
24. Mukhopadhyay, S. K. and Gopalakrishnan, A., 1995, Vector analytic (VECAN) method for solving the machine-part grouping problem in GT. International Journal of Production Research, 33 (3), 795-818.
25. Rajagopalan, R. and Batra, J., 1975, Design of cellular manufacturing systems-a graph theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 13 (6), 56-68.
26. Scott, D., 1964, Measurement models and linear inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1 (7), 233-248.
27. Seifoddini, H., 1989, A note on similarity co-efficient method and the problem of machine assignment in group technology applications. International Journal of Production Research, 27 (7), 1161-1165.
28. Shtub, A., 1989, Modelling group technology cell formation as a generalized assignment problem. International Journal of Production Research, 27 (5), 755-782.
29. Srinivasan, G., Narendran, T T. and Mahadevan, B., 1990, An assignment model for the part families problem in group technology. International Journal of Production Research, 28 (2), 145-152.
30. Tabucanon, M. T. and Ojha, R., 1987, ICRMA, a heuristic approach for intercell flow reduction in cellular manufacturing systems, Material Flow, 4 (3), 189-197.
31. Tversky, A., 1962, Additivity, utility and subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4 (6), 175-201.
32. Waghodekar, P. H. and Sahu, S., 1984, Machine-component cell formation in group technology, MACE. International Journal of Production Research, 22 (6), 937-948.
33. Young, F. W., 1969, Polynomial conjoint analysis of similarities: definitions for a specific algorithm. Research paper 76. Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina, USA.