Strength of core build-up materials in endodontically-treated teeth

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 166-172

  Foley, Jennifer ^a   Saunders, Elizabeth ^b   Saunders, William P ^c  

^a DUNDEE DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c GLASGOW DENTAL HOSPITAL AND SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; CEMENT; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTOUR; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ALLOYS; CERMET CEMENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0031197243     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 780-784.
2. Wendt SL, Harris BM, Hunt TE. Resistance to cusp fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 232-235.
3. Goerig AC, Mueninghoff LA. Management of the endodontically treated tooth. Part I: Concept for restorative designs. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 340-345.
4. Hunter AJ, Flood AM. The restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Part 3. Cores. Aust Dent J 1989; 34: 115-121.
5. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, et al. Root fracture during insertion of prefabricated posts related to root size. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 786-789.
6. Tjan AHL, Whang GSB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 496-500.
7. Galindo Y. Stress-induced effects of retentive pins. A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 183-186.
8. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Fracture resistance of composite and amalgam cores retained by pins coated with new adhesive resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 752-760.
9. Shavell HM. The amalgampin technique for complex amalgam restorations. J Calif Dent Assoc 1980; 8: 48-55.
10. Shavell HM. Updating the amalgampin technique for complex amalgam restorations. Int J Periodont Rest 1986; 5: 23-35.
11. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR, Lee JKY. Fracture resistance of amalgam and composite resin cores retained by various intradentinal retentive features. Quint Int 1993; 24: 211-217.
12. Plasmans PJM, Welle PR, Vrijhoef MA. The tensile resistance of extensive amalgam restorations with auxiliary retention. Quint Int 1986; 17: 411-414.
13. Plasmans PJM, Kusters ST, De Jonge BA, et al. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 16-20.
14. Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43: 511-515.
15. Taleghani M, Morgan RW. Reconstructive materials for endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 446-449.
16. Taleghani M, Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of a new glass ionomer cement with silver as a core build-up under a cast restoration. Quint Int 1988; 19: 19-24.
17. Mertz KA, Parker MW, Pelleu GB. Shear strength of two coronal-radicular amalgams and a pin-retained amalgam. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 289 (Abstr 1458).
18. Larson TD, Jensen JR. Microleakage of composite resin and amalgam core material under complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 44: 40-44.
19. Eley BM, Cox SW. The release, absorption and possible health effects of mercury from dental amalgam: A review of recent findings. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 355-362.
20. Jones DW. The enigma of amalgam in dentistry. Br Dent J 1994; 177: 159-170.
21. Oliva RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of composite used as a core material. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56: 554-561.
22. Oliva RA, Lowe JA. Dimensional stability of silver amalgam and composite used as core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 554-559.
23. Burke FJT, Watts DC. Cermet - An ideal core material for posterior teeth? Dent Update 1990; 17: 364-370.
24. Yardley RM. Custom core construction using glass-ionomer cements. Dent Update 1990; 17: 124-127.
25. McLean JW. The clinical use of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36: 693-711.
26. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long-term fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 158-160.
27. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Dentone JC, et al. Enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from a glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1984; 18: 250-257.
28. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991; 36: 236-239.
29. Berg JH, Donly KJ, Posnick WR. Glass ionomer-silver restorations: A demineralization-remineralization concept. Quint Int 1988; 19: 639-641.
30. Walls AWG, Adamson J, McCabe JF, et al. The properties of a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement incorporating sintered metallic particles. Dent Mater 1987; 3: 113-116.
31. Lacefield WR, Reindl MC, Retief DH. Tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53: 194-198.
32. Arcoria CJ, De Wald JP, Moody CR, et al. A comparative study of the bond strengths of amalgam and alloy-glass ionomer cores. J Oral Rehabil 1989; 16: 301-307.
33. DeWald JP, Arcoria CJ, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of glass-cermet cores under cast crowns. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 129-132.
34. Mathis RS, Ferracane JL. Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 355-358.
35. Levartovsky S, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. The shear bond strength of three core materials to demin. J Dent Res 1994;73: 218 (Abstr 932).
36. Momoi Y, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from light-activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 151-154.
37. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1836-1841.
38. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Erickson RL, et al. Radiopacity of restorations and detection of secondary caries. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 114-117.
39. Robbins J, Cooley R, Barnwell S. Dimensional stability and strength of reinforced glass ionomer core build-up. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 251 (Abstr 559).
40. Brandall JL, Nicholls JI, Harrington GW. A comparison of three restorative techniques for endodontically anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 161-165.
41. Huysmans MCDNJM, Peters, MCRB, Plasschaert AJM, et al. Failure characteristics of endodontically treated premolars restored with a post and direct restorative material. Int Endod J 1992; 25: 121-129.
42. Ulusoy N, Nayyar A, Morris CF, et al. Fracture durability of restored functional cusps on maxillary nonvital premolar teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 330-335.
43. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 584-590.
44. Boyd NB, Benediktsson H, Vimy MJ, et al. Mercury from dental "silver" tooth fillings impairs sheep kidney function. Am J Physiol 1991; 261: R1010-R1014.
45. Mackert JR. Dental amalgam and mercury. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122: 54-61.
46. Molin M, Bergman B, Marklund SL, et al. Mercury, selenium and glutalhione peroxidase before and after amalgam removal in man. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48: 189-202.
47. Mackert JR, Leffell MS. Wagner DA, et al. Lymphocyte levels in subjects with and without amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122: 49-53.
48. Duxbury AJ, Ead RD. McMmurrough S, et al. Allergy to mercury in dental amalgam. Br Dent J 1982; 152: 47-48.
49. Duxbury AJ, Watts DC, Ead RD. Allergy to dental amalgam. Br Dent J 1982; 152: 344-345.
50. White IR, Smith BGN. Dental amalgam dermatitis. Br Dent J 1984; 156: 259-260.
51. Brodsky JB, Cohen EN, Whitcher C, et al. Occupational exposure to mercury in dentistry and pregnancy outcome. J Am Dent Assoc 1985; 111: 779-780.
52. Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Svare CW, et al. Exhaled mercury following removal and insertion of amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 652-656.
53. Reinhardt JW, Chan KC, Schulein TM. Mercury vaporization during amalgam removal. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 62-64.
54. Richards JM, Warren PJ. Mercury vapour released during the removal of old amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1985; 159: 231-232.
55. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Intra-oral air mercury released from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1069-1071.
56. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Serial measurements of intra-oral air mercury: Estimation of daily dose from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1985; 64: 1072-1075.
57. Mackert JR. Factors affecting estimation of dental amalgam mercury exposure from measurements of mercury vapor levels in intra-oral and expired air. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1775-1780.
58. Berglund A. Estimation by a 24-hour study of the daily dose of intra-oral mercury vapor inhaled after release from dental amalgam. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1646-1651.
59. Bjorkman L, Lind B. Factors influencing mercury evaporation rate from dental amalgam fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1992; 100: 354-360.
60. Abraham JE, Svare CW, Frank CW. The effect of dental amalgam restorations on blood mercury levels. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 71-73.
61. Snapp KR, Boyer DB, Peterson LC, et al. The contribution of dental amalgam to mercury in blood. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 780-785.
62. Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Vimy MJ, et al. Dental "silver" tooth fillings: A source of mercury exposure revealed by whole-body image scan and tissue analysis. FASEB J 1989; 3: 2641-2646.
63. Hahn LJ, Kloiber R, Leininger RW, et al. Whole-body imaging of the distribution of mercury released from dental fillings into monkey tissue. FASEB J 1990; 4: 3256-3260.
64. Danscher G, Horsted-Bindslev P, Rungby J. Traces of mercury in organs from primates with amalgam fillings. Exp Mol Pathol 1990; 291-299.
65. Sasanaluckit P, Albustany KR, Doherty PJ, et al. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1993; 14: 906-916.
66. Technical product profile. 3M Vitremer. Tri-cure glass ionomer system. 3M Co., St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992.
67. Michelich R, Dillard T, Nayyar A. Mechanical properties of amalgam build-ups for endodontically treated molars. J Dent Res 1980; 59: 381 (Abstr 455).
68. Michelich R, Nayyar A, Leonard L. Mechanical properties of amalgam core build-ups for endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 1981; 60: 630 (Abstr 1283).
69. Nayyar A, Mcdonald TR, Turner RF, et al. Strength of premolar corono-radicular build-ups restored with cast crowns. J Dent Res 1982; 61: 186 (Abstr 70).
70. Christian GW, Button GL, Moon PC, et al. Post core restoration in endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Endodont 1981; 7: 182-185.
71. Kern SB, Von Frauhofer JA, Mueninghoff LA. An in vitro comparison of two dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 509-514.
72. Kane J, Burgess JO, Summitt JB. Fracture resistance of amalgam coronal-radicular restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 607-613.