Implausible hypotheses in the directional theory of issue voting

European Journal of Political Research

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 31-50

  Granberg, Donald ^a   Gilljam, Mikael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031195351     PISSN: 03044130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.00330     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beck, W. (1957). Modern science and the nature of life. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
2. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
3. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
4. Enelow, J. & Hinich, M. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Esaiasson, P. & Granberg, D. (1993). Hidden negativism: Evaluation of Swedish political parties and their leaders under three different survey methods, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 5: 265-77.
6. Gilljam, M. (1988). Svenska folket och löntagarfonderna: En studie i politisk åsiktsbildning. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
7. Gilljam, M. (1997). The directional theory under the magnifying glass: A reappraisal, Journal of Theoretical Politics (in press).
8. Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (1990). Rött blått grönt: En bok om 1988 års riksdagsval. Stockholm: Bonniers.
9. Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (1993). Väljarna inför 90-talet. Stockholm: Norstedts.
10. Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (1995). Väljarnas val. Stockholm: Norstedts.
11. Gilljam, M. & Oscarsson, H. (1995). Mapping the Nordic party space, Scandanavian Political Studies 19: 25-43.
12. Granberg, D. & Brown, T. (1992). The perception of ideological distance, Western Political Quarterly 45: 727-750.
13. Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1988). The political system matters: Social psychology and voting behavior in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1990). The person positivity and principal actor hypotheses, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 20: 1879-1901.
15. Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1991). Self-reported turnout and voter validation, American Journal of Political Science 35: 448-459.
16. Holmberg, S. (1981). Svenska väljare. Stockholm: Liber.
17. Holmberg, S. (1984). Väljare i förändring. Stockholm: Liber.
18. Holmberg, S. (1994). Election studies the Swedish way, European Journal of Political Research 25: 309-322.
19. Holmberg, S. & Gilljam, M. (1987). Väljare och val i Sverige. Stockholm: Bonniers.
20. Listhaug, O., Macdonald, S.E. & Rabinowitz, G. (1990). A comparative spatial analysis of European party systems, Scandanavian Political Studies 13: 227-254.
21. Macdonald, S.E., Listhaug O. & Rabinowitz, G. (1991). Issues and party support in multiparty systems, American Political Science Review 85: 1107-1131.
22. Macdonald, S.E., Rabinowitz, G. & Listhaug, O. (1995). Political sophistication and models of issue voting, British Journal of Political Science 25: 453-483.
23. Rabinowitz, G. & Macdonald, S.E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting, American Political Science Review 83: 93-121.
24. Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E. & Listhaug, O. (1991). New players in an old game: Party strategy in multiparty systems, Comparative Political Studies 24: 147-185.
25. Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M. & Nebergall, R. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Philadelphia: Saunders.
26. Sherif, M. & Hoviand, C. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
27. Tillie, J. (1994). Party utility and voting behavior. PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam.