System-development matrix for adaptive management of coastal ecosystem restoration projects

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 219-232

  Thom, Ronald M ^a  

^a BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

AdaptiveManagement; Coastal Habitats; Estuary; Marine Monitoring; Restoration; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COASTAL ECOSYSTEM; COASTAL MANAGEMENT; COASTAL ZONE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; HABITAT RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT APPROACH; MATRIX MODEL; RESTORATION PROJECT; RESTORATION PROJECTS; SYSTEM-DEVELOPMENT MATRIX;

HALOPHILA;

EID: 0031194585     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00012-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boesch, D.F., Josselyn, M.N., Mehta, A.J., Morris, J.T., Nuttle, W.K., Simenstad, C.A., Swift, D.J.P., 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana. J. Coastal Res. Special Issue 20: 103.
2. Bradshaw, A.D., 1987. The reclamation of derelict land and the ecology of ecosystems. In: Jordan, W.R. III, Gilpin, M.E., Aber, J.D. (Eds.), Restoration Ecology: A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge University Press, pp. 53-74.
3. FEMAT (Forest Ecosystem Management Team), 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. US Deptartment of Agriculture.
4. Fonseca, M.S., Kenworthy, W.J., Courtney, F.X., 1996a. Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA, I. Plant components. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 132: 127-139.
5. Fonseca, M.S., Meyer, D.L., Hall, M.O., 1996b. Development of planted seagrass beds in Tampa Bay, Florida, USA. II. Faunal components.. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 132: 141-156.
6. Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M., 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.
7. Gosselink, J.G., Lee, L.C., Muir, T.A., 1990. The regulation and management of bottomland hardwood forest wetlands: implications of the EPA-sponsored workshops. In: Gosselink, J.G., Lee, L.C., Muir, T.A. (Eds.), Ecological Processes and Cumulative Impacts: Illustrated by Bottomland Hardwood Wetland Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan, pp. 638-671.
8. Grime, J.P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, New York, 222 pp.
9. Hennessey, T.M., 1994. Governance and adaptive management for estuarine ecosystems: the case of Chesapeake Bay. Coastal Manag. 22: 119-145.
10. Kentula, M.E., Brooks, R.P., Gwin, S.E., Holland, C.C., Sherman, A.D., Sifneos, J.C., 1992. An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, EPA/600/R-92/150, 151 pp.
11. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1990. Managing troubled waters: the role of marine environmental monitoring. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 125 pp.
12. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 552 pp.
13. Rhoads, D.C., McCall, P.L., Yingst, J.Y., 1978. Disturbance and production on the estuarine sea floor. Am. Sci. 66: 577-586.
14. Shreffler, D.K., Simenstad, C.A., Thorn, R.M., 1990. Temporary residence by juvenile salmon of a restored estuarine wetland. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 47: 2079-2084.
15. Shreffler, D.K., Simenstad, C.A., Thorn, R.M., 1992. Juvenile salmon foraging in a restored estuarine wetland. Estuaries 15: 204-213.
16. Shreffler, D.K., Thom, R.M., 1993. Restoration of urban estuaries; new approaches for site location and design. Prepared by Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories for Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.
17. Simenstad, C.A., Thom, R.M., 1996. Functional equivalency trajectories of the restored Gog-Le-Hi-Te estuarine wetland. Eco. Appl. 6: 38-56.
18. Smith, R.D., Ammann, A., Bartoldus, C., Brinson, M.M., 1995. An approach for assessing wetland functions using hydrogeomorphic classification, reference wetlands, and functional indices. Final report, Waterways Experiment Station, US Army Corps of Engineers. Vicksburg, MS. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-9.
19. Sousa, W.P., 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System 15: 353-391.
20. Thom, R.M. and Wellman, K.F., 1997. Planning aquatic ecosystem restoration monitoring programs. Final Report to Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia, IWR 96-R-23.
21. Toth, L.A., 1995. Principles and guidelines for restoration of river/floodplain ecosystems-Kissimmee River, Florida. In: Cairns, J. Jr. (Ed.), Rehabilitating Damaged Ecosystems, 2nd ed. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 49-73.
22. US Army, 1995. Water resources policies and authorities ecosystem restoration in the Civil Works program. Circular No. 1105-2-210, EC 1105-2-210, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.
23. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1980. Habitat evaluation procedures. ESM 102. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Washington, DC.
24. van der Valk, A.G., 1981. Succession in wetlands: A Gleasonian approach. Ecology 62: 688-696.
25. Walters, C.J., Hilborn, R., 1978. Ecological optimization and adaptive management. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 157-188.
26. Walters, C.J., Holling, C.S., 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71: 2060-2068.
27. Word, J.Q., 1990. The infaunal trophic index, a functional approach to benthic community analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.