An adaptive Reichardt detector model of motion adaptation in insects and mammals

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 741-749

  Clifford, Colin W G ^a,c,d   Ibbotson, Michael R ^b   Langley, Keith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational model; Motion adaptation; Reichardt detector

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031194140     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523800012694     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ATTNEAVE, F. (1954). Informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61, 183-193.
2. BARLOW, H.B. (1961). The coding of sensory messages. In Current Problems in Animal Behaviour, ed. THORPE, W.H. & ZANGWILL, O.L., pp. 331-360. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. BORST, A. & BAHDE, S. (1986). What kind of movement detector is triggering the landing response of the housefly? Biological Cybernetics 55, 59-69.
4. BORST, A. & EGELHAAF, M. (1987). Temporal modulation of luminance adapts time constant of fly movement detectors. Biological Cybernetics 56, 209-215.
5. BORST, A. & EGELHAAF, M. (1989). Principles of visual motion detection. Trends in Neurosciences 12, 297-306.
6. CLARKSON, P.M. (1993). Optimal and Adaptive Signal Processing. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
7. CLIFFORD, C.W.G. & LANGLKY, K. (1996a). Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology. Current Biology 6, 1340-1342.
8. CLIFFORD, C.W.G. & LANGLEY, K. (1996b). A model of temporal adaptation in fly motion vision. Vision Research 36, 2595-2608.
9. DE RUYTER VAN STEVENINCK, R.R., ZAAGMAN, W.H. & MASTERBROEK, H.A.K. (1986). Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Biological Cybernetics 54, 223-236.
10. EGELHAAF, M. & BORST, A. (1989). Transient and steady-state response properties of movement detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 6, 116-127.
11. EGELHAAF, M., BORST, A. & REICHARDT, W. (1989). Computational structure of a biological motion-detection system as revealed by local detector analysis in the fly's nervous system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 6, 1070-1087.
12. GIASCHI, D., DOUGLAS, R., MARLIN, S. & CYNADER, M. (1993). The time course of direction-selective adaptation in simple and complex cells in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 70, 2024-2034.
13. GREENLEE, M.W. & HEITGER, F. (1988). The functional role of contrast adaptation. Vision Research 28, 791-797.
14. HAMMOND, P., MOUAT, G.S.V. & SMITH, A.T. (1988). Neural correlates of motion after-effects in cat striate cortical neurones: Monocular adaptation. Experimental Brain Research 72, 1-20.
15. IBBOTSON, M.R., CLIFFORD, C.W.G. & MARK, R.F. (1997). Adaptation enhances the dynamic range of directional neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract. Journal of Neurophysiology (in press).
16. IBBOTSON, M.R. & MARK, R.F. (1996). Impulse responses distinguish two classes of directional motion-sensitive neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract Journal of Neurophysiology 75, 996-1007.
17. IBBOTSON, M.R., MARK, R.F. & MADDESS, T. (1994). Spatiotemporal response properties of direction-selective neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract and the dorsal terminal nucleus of the wallaby. Macropus eugenii. Journal of Neurophysiology 72, 2927-2943.
18. IBBOTSON, M.R. & MADDESS, T. (1994). The effects of adaptation to visual stimuli on the velocity of subsequent ocular following responses. Experimental Brain Research 99, 148-154.
19. LAUGHLIN, S.B. (1989). Coding efficiency and design in visual processing. In Facets of Vision, ed. STAVENGA, D.G. & HARDIE, R.C., pp. 213-234. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. MADDESS, T., DUBOIS, R.A. & IBBOTSON, MR (1991). Response properties and adaptation of neurones sensitive to image motion in the butterfly Papilio Aegeus. Journal of Experimental Biology 161, 171-199.
21. MADDESS, T. & IBBOTSON, M.R. (1992). Human ocular response following responses are plastic: Evidence for control by temporal frequency-dependent cortical adaptation. Experimental Brain Research 91, 525-538.
22. MADDESS, T. & LAUGHLIN, S.B. (1985). Adaptation of the motion sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proceeding of the Royal Society B (London) 225, 251-275.
23. MADDESS, T., MCCOURT, M.E., BLAKESEE, B. & CUNNINGHAM, R.B. (1988). Factors governing the adaptation of cells in area-17 of the cat visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics 59, 229-236
24. OHZAWA, I., SCLAR, R.D. & FREEMAN, R.D. (1982). Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex. Nature 298, 266-268.
25. REICHARDT, W. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In Principles of Sensory Communication, ed. ROSENBLITH, W.A., pp. 303-317. New York: Wiley.
26. SHI JIAN & HORRIDGE, G.A. (1991). The H1 neuron measures change in velocity irrespective of contrast frequency, mean velocity or velocity modulation frequency. Proceedings of The Royal Society B (London) 331, 205-211.
27. SRINIVASAN, M.V. (1983). The impulse response of a movement detecting neuron and its interpretation. Vision Research 23, 659-663.
28. VAN SANTEN, J.P.H. & SPERLING, G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2, 300-321.
29. VAUTIN, R.G. & BERKLEY, M.A. (1977). Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: Neural correlates of visual after-effects. Journal of Neurophysiology 40, 1051-1065.
30. ZANKER, J.M. (1995). Of models and men: Mechanisms of human motion perception. In Early Vision and Beyond, ed. PAPATHOMAS, T.V., GOREA, A. & CHUBB, C., pp. 156-165. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.