The importance of site-specific information in the design of policies to control pollution

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 347-358

  Fleming, R A ^a   Adams, R M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POLICY DESIGN; POLLUTION CONTROL; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK; SPATIAL VARIATION;

MALHEUR COUNTY; OREGON; USA;

EID: 0031193591     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1997.0990     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. G. Abler, 1994, A comparison of the performance of alternative agricultural nonpoint pollution controls.
2. Bower H. Groundwater Hydrology. 1978;McGraw-Hill, New York.
3. Braden J. B., Johnson G. V., Bouzaher A., Miltz D. Optimal spatial management of agricultural pollution. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 71:1989;404-413.
4. Chowdhury M. E., Lacewell R. D. Implications of alternative policies on nitrate contamination of groundwater. J. Agr. Resour. Econom. 21:1996;82-95.
5. Dosi C., Moretto M. NPS pollution, information asymmetry, and the choice of time profile for environmental fees. Theory, Modeling and Experience in the Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution. 1993;Kluwer Academic, Norwell.
6. M. English, 1995.
7. Griffin R. C. Environmental policy for spatial and persistent pollutants. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 14:1987;41-53.
8. Helfand G. E., House B. W. Regulating nonpoint source pollution under heterogeneous conditions. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 77:1995;1024-1032.
9. Johnson S. L., Adams R. M., Perry G. M. The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 73:1991;1064-1073.
10. LaFrance J. T., Watts M. J. Public grazing in the west and "rangeland reform '94," Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 77:1995;447-461.
11. Larson D. M., Helfand G. E., House B. W. Second-best tax policies to reduce nonpoint source pollution. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 78:1996;1108-1117.
12. Lee D. J., Howitt R. E., Marino M. A. A stochastic model of river water quality: application to salinity in the Colorado river. Water Resour. Res. 29:1993;3917-3923.
13. Malheur County Agriculture, 1992. 1992;Malheur County OfficeOregon State University Extension Service, Ontario.
14. Northern Malheur County Groundwater Management Action Plan. December, 1991;State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland.
15. Mapp H. P., Bernardo D. J., Sabbagh G. J., Geleta S., Watkins K. B. Economic and environmental impacts of limiting nitrogen use to protect water quality: A stochastic regional analysis. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 76:1994;889-903.
16. Miltz D., Braden J. B., Johnson G. V. Standards versus prices revisited: The case of agricultural nonpoint source pollution. J. Agr. Econom. 39:1988;360-368.
17. Pigou A. Economics of Welfare. 1932;Macmillan Co. New York.
18. Shortle J. S., Abler D. G. Incentives for nonpoint pollution control. Dosi C., Graham-Tomasi T. Nonpoint Source Pollution Regulation: Issues and Analysis. 1994;Kluwer Academic, Boston.
19. Shortle J. S., Dunn J. W. The relative efficiency of agricultural source water pollution control policies. Amer. J. Agr. Econom. 68:1986;668-677.
20. Segerson K. Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 15:1988;87-98.
21. Tietenberg T. H. Derived decision rules for pollution control in a general equilibrium space economy. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 1:1974;3-16.
22. United States General Accounting Office (USAGO), June, 1995, Animal Agriculture: Information on Waste Management and Water Quality Issues.
23. D. S. Walker, 1989, Groundwater Flow Model for the Lower Malheur Basin near Ontario, Oregon, Department of Civil Engineering, Oregon State University.
24. Xepapadeas A. Optimal taxes for pollution regulation: Dynamic, spatial and stochastic characteristics. Natur. Resour. Modeling. 6:1992;139-170.